바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Toward a Space of Dissensus: The Oasis’s Performance in Urban Space, Scriptive Things and Relational Aesthetics

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2019, v.59 no.2, pp.202-227
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2019.59.2.202

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper reappraises the Oasis project’s performance of occupying the Mokdong Artists Hall in Seoul in 2004, utilizing the concept of scriptive things within relational aesthetics and politics as dissensus. The construction of the hall originated in the election pledges of former President Kim Young-sam and was led by the Federation of Artistic & Cultural Organization of Korea to allow artists to rent spaces for their activities. In 2003, a Korean parliament audit was conducted on a corruption allegation raised against the federation, following which the government subsidies to the federation for the project were confiscated. In January 2004 the Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism took over the project to establish a fair and transparent process for the building’s construction. Despite the ministry’s intervention the hall was abandoned due to its suspended construction. This triggered Oasis’ decision to occupy the hall in 2004, with the aim of raising awareness of fundamental issues related to artists’ work spaces. Employing a space of dissensus where what is registered as mere noise by the police is turned into voice, I conclude that the reality of appearance illuminates the politics in the Oasis project’s performance, pointing attention as to why art space matters in Korea and focusing on the issue of artists who were expelled recently from urban regeneration areas due to the problem of gentrification.

keywords
art space dissensus performing remains relational aesthetics scriptive things squat urban space urban regeneration

Reference

1.

Bassett, Keith. 2014. “Rancière, Politics, and the Occupy Movement.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32.5: 886–901.

2.

Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.

3.

Bernstein, Robin. 2009. “Dances with Things: Material Culture and the Performance of Race.” Social Text 27.4: 67–94.

4.

Bishop, Claire. 2005. Installation Art: A Critical History. New York: Routledge.

5.

Boano, Camillo, and Emily Kelling. 2013. “Toward an Architecture of Dissensus:Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia.” FOOTPRINT 7.2: 41–62.

6.

Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Translated by Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.

7.

Cho, Myung-rae. 2011. “Munhwajeok dosi jaesaeng-gwa gonggongseong-ui hoebok:Hangukjeok dosi jaesaeng-e gwanhan bipanjeok seongchal” (Critical Reflections on the Korean Practices of Urban Regeneration). Gonggan-gwa sahoe (Space and Society) 37: 39–65.

8.

Choi, Mak-jung., and Jung-sun Yun. 2011. “Dosi gaebal-eseo dosigwanri-ui sidae-ro jeonhwan haneun hanguk dosi, geu mirae-reul jindan handa” (Diagnosing the Future of Korean Cities Transforming from the Era of City Development to the Era of City Mangement). Dosi munje (City Problem) 46.4: 59–61.

9.

Dikec, Mustafa. 2012. “Space as a Mode of Political Thinking.” Geoforum 43: 669–676.

10.

Kim, Dong-il, and Jung-ae Yang. 2013. “Sangjing tujaengja-roseoui yesulga” (Artist as Symbolic Struggler: The Case of the Oasis Project 2003–2007). Munhwa-wa sahoe (Culture and Society) 14: 177–213.

11.

Kim, Joon-ky. “Haengdong yesul I: jeomgeo” (Activist Art I: Squat). Kyunghyang Shinmun, last modified May 8, 2015, http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201505082116575&code=960202.

12.

Kim, Kang. 2008. Squat: Sam-gwa yesul-ui silheomsil (Laboratory of Life and Art). Seoul: Munhwa gwahaksa.

13.

Kim, Youn-hoan, and Kang Kim. 2007. Art of Squat: Jeomgeo maenyueol buk (A Manual for Occupying). Seoul: Oasis Project.

14.

Kim, Youn-hoan, and Kang Kim. 2016. Interviewed by author, September 28, 2016.

15.

Lee, Kwang-suk. 2016. Oksang-ui mihak noteu: paguk-e masseoneun yesul haengdong tamsagi (Aesthetic Notes from the Rooftop: A Exploration Record on Art Activism Responding to a Social Crisis). Seoul: Hyeonsil munhwasa.

16.

Massumi, Brian. 2010. “The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Threat.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 52–70. Durham: Duke UP.

17.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT). Dosi jaesaeng hwalseonghwa mit jiwon-e gwanhan teukbyeolbeop sihaengnyeong ipbeob yego (Enforcement Decree of the Special Act on Promotion of and Support for Urban Regeneration). Ipbeo byego. (Legislative Notice). Seoul: MOLIT. 2013.

18.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT). 2018-nyeon dosi jaesaeng nyudil saup baek got naeoe seonjeong chujin (100Projects for Urban Regeneration New Deal Policy Planned to be Selected by Government). Bodojaryo (Press Release). Seoul: MOLIT. 2018.

19.

Rancière, Jacques. 2006. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. New York: Continuum.

20.

Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Translated by Gregory Elliott. New York:Verso.

21.

Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Translated by Steve Corcoran. New York: Continuum.

22.

Schneider, Rebecca. 2011. Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment. New York: Routledge.

23.

Seigworth, Gregory J., and Melissa Gregg. 2010. “An Inventory of Shimmers.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 1–25. Durham: Duke UP.

24.

Sevilla-Buitrago, Alvaro. 2015. “Outraged Spatialities: The Production of Public Space in the #Spanishrevolution.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14.1: 90–103.

25.

Swyngedouw, Erik. 2011. “Interrogating Post-Democratization: Reclaiming Egalitarian Political Spaces.” Political Geography 30.2: 370–380.

Korea Journal