바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Bringing Society Back In: The New Qinghe Experiment and Social Governance in China

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2018, v.58 no.1, pp.70-95
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2018.58.1.70
Qiang Li (Tsinghua University)
Lu Zheng (Tsinghua University)
Hao Wang (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

With a population of 1.4 billion people, China is undergoing perhaps the largest scaleurbanization in human history and experiencing a great transformation towardmodernization. Against this background, a multidisciplinary research team fromTsinghua University initiated a social governance experiment in the Qinghe subdistrictof Beijing in 2014. This expert-led social intervention and research project has beenknown as the New Qinghe Experiment (NQE), to distinguish it from an earlier Qingheexperiment, which focused on rural development, conducted by a group of Yenchingsociologists in the period of 1928–1937. The goal of the NQE is to identify and solvesocial problems existent in urban communities, and to explore a new governance modelfor urban communities in highly populated mega-cities such as Beijing. In this paper,we lay out the challenges faced by local communities in urban China and introduce theNQE’s pilot projects and working mechanisms. We conclude that the NQE is of importanttheoretical and practical significance as an innovative model of social governance.

keywords
Qinghe Experiment social governance social intervention urban communities in China

Reference

1.

Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated by Mark Ritter. New Delhi: Sage. Originally published as Risikogesellschaft-Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986).

2.

Burgess, Ernest, and Donald J. Bogue, eds. 1964. Contributions to Urban Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

3.

Giddens, Anthony. 1999. “Risk and Responsibility.” Modern Law Review 62.1: 1–10.

4.

Hall, Peter, and Colin Ward. 1998. Sociable Cities: The Legacy of Ebenezer Howard. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

5.

Li, Qiang, and Xuhong Huang. 2011. “Beidong shehui ruhe bianwei nengdong shehui 被動社會如何變為能動社會” (How to Turn a Passive Society into a Dynamic Society?). Renmin Luntan 人民論壇 (People’s Forum)10: 50–51.

6.

Lynd, Robert S., and Helen Merrell Lynd. [1929] 1956. Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

7.

Ma, Wei. 2009. “Yang Kaidao xueshu yanjiu zongshu 楊開道學術研究綜述” (Review of Yang Kaidao’s Academic Research). Huazhong nongyedaxue xuebao (shehuikexue ban) 華中農業大學學報 (社會科學版) (Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 2: 1–5.

8.

Meacham, Standish. 1999. Regaining Paradise: Englishness and the Early Garden City Movement. New Haven: Yale University Press.

9.

Park, Robert E. 1915. “The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Behavior in the City Environment.” American Journal of Sociology 20: 579–583.

10.

Wei, Wenyi. 2016. “C ong Xiangzhi dao Xiangcunjianshe: Liang Shuming xueshudaolu de yanjin yiji dui jiceng shehuizhili de qishi 從鄉治到鄉村建設 : 梁 漱溟學術道路的演進以及對基層社會治理的啟示” (From Rural Governance to Rural Construction: Evolution of Liang Shuming’s Thinking and Its Implications to Local Social Governance). Shangdong shehuikexue 山東社會科學 (Shangdong Social Sciences) 254.10: 64–70.

11.

Wirth, Louis. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life: The City and Contemporary Civilization.” American Journal of Sociology 44: 1–24.

12.

Yan, Ming. 2008. “Yang Kaidao yu qingheshiyanshi 楊開道與清河 實驗室 (Yang Kaidao and the Qinghe Lab). Zhongguo shehui daokan 中國社會導刊 (China Society Journal) 9: 48–51.

13.

Zhang, Minwei, and Yan Qin. 2001. “Shouwangxiangzhu zhililide: zhuming shehuixuejia feixiaotong jieshou benkan zhuanfang 守望相助 知理立德: 著名 社會學家費孝通接受本刊專訪” (Mutual Assistance in Communities and Building up Virtues by Practicing Courtesy: An Interview with the Renowned Sociologist Fei Xiaotong). Shequ 社區 (Community)11: 4–6.

Korea Journal