바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Can One Enchant in theGanpan Republic? Reading the Korean Signscapes through the Theories of Enchantment

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2017, v.57 no.3, pp.141-165
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2017.57.3.141

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this article, I explore ways in which one can make relationships with the commer- cially saturated environments of contemporary Korea in nuanced ways, by taking the term “the Ganpan Republic” (literally, “the signboard republic”) as a threshold. In doing so, this article offers three bodies of work: first, an introduction to the theories of enchantment; second, an analysis of the recent mega-scale urban project called Design Seoul with an emphasis on the ganpan; and third, a comparison of Design Seoul with French artist Manoël Pillard’s nightscape paintings of Seoul. While Pillard, as a non-Korean, pays full attention to the minute details of the signscapes with curiosity and revitalizes them through his painterly practice, Design Seoul strives to remove it from the domain of everyday life, thereby establishing a clutter-free cityscape. Instead of simply taking up the position of either Pillard or Design Seoul, I argue that reading the two together through the notion of enchantment encourages us to be attentive to the multiple sensorial dimensions of the ganpan, thus addressing the nature of the materials that are simultaneously distracting and sense-provoking.

keywords
enchantment the Ganpan Republic Korean signscapes disenchantment Manoël Pillard Design Seoul signboard

Reference

1.

Bennett, Jane. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

2.

Carroll, Anthony J. 2012. “Disenchantment, Rationality, and the Modernity of Max Weber.” Forum Philosophicum 16.1: 117–137.

3.

Chang, Kyung-Sup. 1990. “Compressed Modernity and Its Discontents: South Korean Society in Transition.” Economy and Society 28.1: 30–55.

4.

Choi, Bum. 2008. Hanguk dijain, eodiro ganeunga (Korean Design, Where Is It Headed?). Paju: Ahn Graphics.

5.

Choi, Bu-deuk. 2002. Byeorang-e seon dosi-wa geonchuk (City and Architecture Standing on a Cliff). Seoul: Misul Munhwa.

6.

Chung, Guyon, ed. 2004. City of the Bang: 2004 Venice Biennale 9th International Architecture Exhibition. Seoul: The Korean Culture and Arts Foundation.

7.

Debord, Guy. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Book.

8.

Elkins, James, and David Morgan, eds. 2009. Re-Enchantment. New York: Routledge.

9.

Gane, Nicholas. 2002. Max Weber and Postmodern Theory: Rationalization versus Re-enchantment. Hampshire: Palgrave.

10.

Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory Seigworth, eds. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

11.

Hansen, George P. 2001. The Trickster and the Paranormal. Philadelphia: Xlibris.

12.

Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

13.

Hsu, Jen-yi. 2007. “Re-enchanting the Everyday Banal in the Age of Globalization:Alienation, Desire, and Critique of Capitalist Temporality in Tsai Ming-Liang’s The Hole and What Time Is It There?” NTU Studies in Language and Literature 17: 133–158.

14.

Huh, Young-Ran, Ryu Jun-Bum, and Kim Je-Jeong. 2001. “Hanguk geunhyeondaesa sok-ui geori gwanggomul-gwa garo gyeonggwan” (Street Advertisements and Street Landscape within the Korean Modern History). In Seoul isip segi saenghwal munhwa byeoncheonsa (Seoul, Twentieth Century: Civic Life and Culture of the Last 100 Years), edited by the Seoul Development Institute, 611–668. Seoul: Seoul Development Institute.

15.

Jenkins, Richard. 2000. “Disenchantment, Enchantment and Re-enchantment: Max Weber at the Millennium.” Max Weber Studies 1.1: 11–32.

16.

Kang, Jun-man. 2006. “Ganpan gonghwaguk-ui jumok tujaeng” (A Struggle for Attention in the Ganpan Republic). Hankyoreh 21, January 1. http://legacy.h21. hani.co.kr/section-021128000/2006/01/021128000200601100593018.html.

17.

Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis:Hackett.

18.

Kim, Jahyun Haboush. 2009. “Creating a Society of Civil Culture: The Early Joseon, 1392-1592.” In Art of the Korean Renaissance, 1400–1600, by Soyoung Lee et al., 3–14. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

19.

Kim, Jin Il. 1977. “Sangga geonmul pasadeu-wa jangchimul mit ganpan-gwaui johwa-e gwanhan yeongu” (A Study on the Harmony of the Façade of Shopping Street with Signboards and Other Decorative Apparatus). Geonchuk (Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea) 21.2: 49–54.

20.

Kim, Kwang Soo. 2005. “The Other Public Space: The Korean ‘-Bang’ Culture.” In Germany—Korea Public Space Forum, edited by Sung Hong Kim and Peter Cachola Schmal, 63–73. Frankfurt: Deutsches Architektur Museum.

21.

Lee, Kyu-mok. 2002. Hanguk-ui dosi gyeonggwan (The Modern Korean Townscape). Seoul: Youlhwadang.

22.

Lee, Sang-hun. 2005. “Peureim-gwa pyopi: Hanguk sangeop geonchuk-ui geundaeseong”(Frame and Surface: Modernity of Korean Commercial Architecture in Korea). Paper presented at the 2005 Conference of the Korean Association of Architectural History, Yonsei University, Seoul, November 19.

23.

Lee, Sang-hun. 2011. “Hanguk sangeop geonchuk immyeon hyeonsang-ui biseogujeok geundaeseong-e daehan yeongu” (A Study on Non-Western Modernity of Surface Phenomena in Korean Commercial Architecture). Hanguk sillae dijain hakhoe nonmunjip (Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal) 20.6: 218–227.

24.

Lee, Raymond L. M. 2010. “Weber, Re-enchantment and Social Futures.” Time and Society 19.2: 180–192.

25.

Loos, Adolf. 1998. Ornament and Crime: Selected Essays. Translated by Michael Mitchell. Riverside, CA: Ariadne Press.

26.

Mackinnon, Malcolm H. 2001. “Max Weber’s Disenchantment: Lineages of Kant and Channing.” Journal of Classical Sociology 1.3: 329–351.

27.

Morgan, David. 1996. “The Enchantment of Art: Abstraction and Empathy from German Romanticism to Expressionism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 57.2:317–341.

28.

Østergaard, Per, James Fitchett, and Christian Jantzen. 2013. “A Critique of the Ontology of Consumer Enchantment.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 12.5:337–344.

29.

Owen, Alex. 2004. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

30.

Paek, Seung-han. 2016. “Asian City as Affective Space: Commercial Signs and Mood in the Paintings of Manoël Pillard (2001–2008).” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 2.1: 222–249.

31.

Parr, Adrian, ed. 2005. The Deleuze Dictionary. New York: Columbia University Press.

32.

Ritzer, George. 1999. Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

33.

Ross, Stephen David. 2012. Enchanting: Beyond Disenchantment. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

34.

Rowe, Peter. 2005. East Asia Modern: Shaping the Contemporary City. London:Reaktion Books.

35.

Saler, Michael. 2006. “Modernity and Enchantment: A Historiographic Review.”American Historical Review 111.3: 692–716.

36.

Scharpf, Fritz W. 2007. “Social Science as a Vocation: Are Max Weber’s Warnings Still Valid?” Max Weber Lecture No. 2007/01, European University Institute, Italy.

37.

SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government). 2008. Ganpan dijain gaideubuk (Signboard Design Guidebook). Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.

38.

SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government). 2009a. Design Seoul Story. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.

39.

SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government). 2009b. 2009 Seoulsi joeun ganpan saryejip (2009 Seoul Good Sign Exhibition). Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.

40.

Vandenabeele, Bart. 2001. “On the Notion of Disinterestedness: Kant, Lyotard, and Schopenhauer.” Journal of the History of Ideas 62.4: 705–720.

41.

Weber, Max. [1930] 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge.

42.

Weber, Max. 1946. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated and edited by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 129–156. New York:Oxford University Press.

Korea Journal