바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Proposals to Safeguard Measures in Korea’s Future Preferential Trade Agreements

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2017, v.57 no.2, pp.69-101
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2017.57.2.69


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The proliferation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) is one notable phenomenon in recent international trade. Korea is actively participating in this trend by concluding a series of free trade agreements (FTAs) with its trading partners. Although PTAs promote internal trade liberalization, trade remedies including safeguard measures may act as a trade barrier because they hinder free flow of products from their countries of origin into importing countries. This article briefly reviews some points of PTAs. Then, it presents proposals to safeguard measures for Korea’s future PTAs. The proposals are made for bilateral and global safeguards, considering the fact that all existing PTAs of Korea have both types of safeguards. However, the proposals include stricter requirements than those of the GATT and the Agreement on Safeguards. Some proposals may be applicable to both bilateral and global safeguards. Some proposals for bilateral safeguards are different from those for global safeguards applied to the other PTA parties, due to the difference in nature between them. Proposals to prevent a simultaneous or a continuous application of a safeguard measure against a product, which has been subject to another safeguard measure, are also presented. The proposals presented in this article will be helpful in negotiations for safeguard measures of Korea’s future PTAs since they are viable ones based on comparing the relevant provisions of existing PTAs.

keywords
Korean preferential trade agreement (PTA) Korean free trade agreement (FTA) regional trade agreement (RTA) regional integration bilateral safeguards global safeguards trade remedy

Reference

1.

Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 1990. “A Theory of Managed Trade.” American Economic Review 80.4: 779–795.

2.

Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 2005. “Enforcement, Private Political Pressure, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Escape Clause.” Journal of Legal Studies 34.2: 471–513.

3.

Barfield, Claude. 2005. “Anti-dumping Reform: Time to Go Back to Basics.” World Economy 28.5: 719–737.

4.

Close, Patricia M. 2006. “Regional Adaptive Synergies in the World Trading System.”Journal of World Trade 40.5: 865–887.

5.

Copeland, Brian R. 1990. “Strategic Interaction among Nations: Negotiable and Non-negotiable Trade Barriers.” Canadian Journal of Economics 23.1: 84–108.

6.

Cottier, Thomas, and Marina Foltea. 2006. “Constitutional Functions of the WTO and Regional Trade Agreements.” In Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, edited by Lorand Bartels and Federico Ortino, 43–76. New York:Oxford University Press.

7.

Crawford, Jo-Ann, and Roberto V. Fiorentino. 2005. “The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements.” WTO Discussion Paper 8. World Trade Organization, Geneva.

8.

Ethier, Wilfred J. 2002. “Unilateralism in a Multilateral World.” Economic Journal 112.479: 266–292.

9.

Fischer, Ronald D., and Thomas J. Prusa. 2003. “WTO Exceptions as Insurance.”Review of International Economics 11.5: 745–757.

10.

Horn, Henrik, Giovanni Maggi, and Robert W. Staiger. 2010. “Trade Agreements as Endogenously Incomplete Contracts.” American Economic Review 100.1: 394–419.

11.

Jackson, John H. 1997. The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

KTC (Korea Trade Commission). 2016. “Trade Remedy Measures.” Accessed December 23, 2016. https://www.ktc.go.kr:20443/en/stats.do.

13.

Lee, Yong-Shik. 2005. Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

14.

Lee, Yong-Shik. 2011. “Reconciling RTAs with the WTO Multilateral Trading System:Case for a New Sunset Requirement on RTAs and Development Facilitation.”Journal of World Trade 45.3: 629–651.

15.

Lima-Campos, Aluisio. 2005. “Nineteen Proposals to Curb Abuse in Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings.” Journal of World Trade 39.2: 239–280.

16.

Martin, Alberto, and Wouter Vergote. 2008. “On the Role of Retaliation in Trade Agreements.” Journal of International Economics 76.1: 61–77.

17.

Mathis, James H. 2002. Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the Internal Trade Requirement. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.

18.

Messerlin, Patrick A., and Hilda Fridh. 2006. “The Agreement on Safeguards: Proposals for Change in the Light of the EC Steel Safeguards.” Journal of World Trade 40.4: 713–751.

19.

MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy), Republic of Korea. 2016. “FTA jeongchaek yoyak” (A Summary of Korea’s FTA Policy). Accessed March 19, 2016. http://www.fta.go.kr/main/situation/kfta/psum/.

20.

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2004. “The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements.”Journal of International Economic Law 7.1: 109–142.

21.

Richardson, Martin. 2009. “Safeguards, Anti-dumping Actions and Countervailing Duties.” In Negotiating a Preferential Trading Agreement, edited by Sisira Jayasuriya, Donald MacLaren, and Gary Magee, 219–234. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

22.

Staiger, Robert W. 2005. “Some Remarks on Reforming WTO AD/CVD Rules.”World Economy 28.5: 739–743.

23.

Sykes, Alan O. 1991. “Protectionism as a ‘Safeguard’: A Positive Analysis of the GATT ‘Escape Clause’ with Normative Speculations.” University of Chicago Law Review 58.1: 255–305.

24.

WTO (World Trade Organization). 2016a. “Regional Trade Agreements.” Accessed December 23, 2016. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm.

25.

WTO (World Trade Organization). 2016b. “Regional Trade Agreements: Facts and Figures.” Accessed December 23, 2016. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/regfac_e.htm.

Korea Journal