바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Factors that Affect Women’s Intentions to Have Additional Children: The Role of the State, Market, and Family

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2014, v.54 no.3, pp.79-102
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2014.54.3.79

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study examines married women’s intentions to have additional children and found that the social sharing of childcare was not a significant factor. The data used for this analysis was the 2009 National Survey of Marriage and Fertility (NSMF), collected through interviews conducted between June 1 and July 17, 2009. Although previous studies have reported a close relationship between social childcare sharing and the fertility rate, this does not seem to be applicable to Korea due to its low degree of social sharing of childcare. Grandparental childcare sharing was also found to be insufficient in influencing additional fertility decisions. On the other hand, gender division of childcare was significantly related to family planning; the possibility of having additional children increased proportionally with the hours that both the father and mother put into childcare. In addition, variables reflecting the unique features of Korean society were significantly related to women’s additional childbirth plans; this indicates that the problem of low fertility in Korea cannot be resolved by solely targeting either social support or gender division of childcare alone.

keywords
childcare policy additional childbirth plan low fertility family childcare gendered division of care

Reference

1.

Adserà, Alicia. 2004. “Changing Fertility Rates in Developed Countries: The Impact of Labor Market Institutions.” Journal of Population Economics 17: 17-43.

2.

Ahn, Yun Sook, and Lee Sang Ho. 2010. “Gongboyuk jeongchaek-i janyeo chulsan uiji-e michineun yeonghyang yoin-e gwanhan yeongu” (A Study of the Influence of Public Childcare and Education on the Intentions to Have Children). Hanguk yeongyuga boyukhak (Korea Journal of Child Care and Education)63: 227-258.

3.

Ajzen, Icek. 2010. “Fertility Intentions and the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Paper presented at the Conference of the European Association for Population Studies, Vienna, Austria, December 2-3.

4.

Association of Daycare Centers in Korea (Hanguk Eorinijip Chong Yeonhaphoe). 2007. “Gyeonggi hoebok jeongchaek hyogwa-ro chulsan neureotta” (Press Release: Birth Rate Increased Due to Economic Recovery and Policy Effects). November 12, 2007. Accessed November 19, 2012. http://www.ncare.or.kr/data/data4.php?key=&keyfield=&mode=read&number=1308&page=7.

5.

Bachrach, Christine, and Philip Morgan. 2011. “Further Reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Fertility Research.” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 71-74.

6.

Baldock, Jhon, and Jan Hadlow. 2004. “Managing the Family: Productivity, Scheduling and the Male Veto.” Social Policy and Administration 38: 706-720.

7.

Brewster, Karin L., and Ronald R. Rindfuss. 2000. “Fertility and Women’s Employment in Industrialized Nations.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 271-296.

8.

Castles, Francis. 2003. “The World Turned Upside Down: Below Replacement Fertility, Changing Preferences and Family-Friendly Public Policy in 21 OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 13: 209-296.

9.

Del Boca, Daniela. 2002. “The Effect of Child Care and Part Time Opportunities on Participation and Fertility Decisions in Italy.” Journal of Population Economics 15: 549-573.

10.

Duvander, Ann-Zofie, and Gunnar Andersson. 2003. “Gender Equality and Fertility in Sweden: A Study on the Impact of the Father's Uptake of Parental Leave on Continued Childbearing.” Working Paper 13, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

11.

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

12.

Folbre, Nancy. 1997. “The Future of the Elephant-Bird.” Population and Development Review 23: 647-654.

13.

Gauthier, Ann, and Jan Hatzius. 1997. “Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis.” Population Studies 51.3: 295-306.

14.

Haan, Peter, and Katharina Wrohlich. 2009. “Can Child Care Policy Encourage Employment and Fertility? Evidence from a Structural Model.” IZA DP No. 4503, Institute for the Study of Labor.

15.

Hwang, Na-Mi. 2003. “Uri nara burim hyeonhwang-gwa jeongchaek gwaje” (The Status of Infertility and Policy Direction in Korea). Bogeonbokji poreom (Health and Welfare Policy Forum) 82: 88-97.

16.

Héran, François. 2005. “Demography and Population Policy: Is It Possible to Draw Any Lessons from the French Case?” Paper presented at the KIPP (Korea Institute of Population Problems) Demographic Forum, Seoul, Korea, April 8.

17.

Jones, Gavin. 2011. “Recent Fertility Trends, Policy Responses and Fertility Prospects in Low Fertility Countries of East and Southeast Asia.” Population Division: Expert Paper, 2011/5. New York: United Nations.

18.

Jones, Gavin, Paulin Straughan, and Angelique Chan. 2009. Ultra-Low Fertility in Pacific Asia: Trends, Causes and Policy Issues. London: Routledge.

19.

Kaufman, Gayle. 2000. “Do Gender Role Attitudes Matter? Family Formation and Dissolution among Traditional and Egalitarian Men and Women.” Journal of Family Issues 21: 128-144.

20.

Kim, Cheong-Seok. 2007. “Gihon yeoseong-ui chulsanasubyeol chuga chulsan gyehoek”(Parity-Specific Approach on the Plans to Have an Additional Child). Hanguk inguhak (Korean Demography) 30: 97-116.

21.

Kim, Doo-Sub. 2007. “IMF oehwan wigi-wa saheo gyeongjejeok chabyeol chulsanryeok-ui byeonhwa” (The 1997 Asian Economic Crisis and Changes in the Pattern of Socioeconomic Differentials in Korean Fertility). Hanguk inguhak (Korean Demography) 30: 67-95.

22.

Kim, Hyun-Jeong. 2010. “Saengae gyeongje hwaldong-e ttareun gihon yeoseong-ui chulsan hyeongtae yeonghyang yoin yeongu” (A Study of the Factors Affecting Married Women’s Fertility Behavior Based on the Patterns of Life Course with Family Role and Economic Activity: With a Focus on Additional Fertility Plans). Hanguk gajeong gwallihak hoeji (Journal of the Korean Home Management Association) 28: 1-11.

23.

Kim, Seung Yong, and Jeong Mee Kyung. 2006. “Son janyeo dolbom-e daehan jomo chwieommo-ui insik josa yeongu” (A Study on Working Mothers’ and Grandmothers’Perceptions of Childcare). Mirae yua gyoyuk hakhoeji (Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education) 11.5: 67-96.

24.

Kim, Yang-Bun, and Yang Soo-Kyung. 2011. Sagyoyukbi chui-wa gyumo yecheuk (The Trends and Predicted Magnitude of Private Tutoring Expenditure). Seoul: Korea Education Development Institute.

25.

Klobas, Jane. 2011. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a Model of Reasoning about Fertility Decisions.” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 47-54.

26.

König, Stefanie. 2011. “Higher Order Births in Germany and Hungary: Comparing Fertility Intentions in a National Context.” Working Paper 146, Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.

27.

Lee, Sam-Sik, et al. 2009. 2009 nyeondo jeonguk gyeolhon mit chulsan donghyang josa (2009 National Marriage and Fertility Trends Survey). Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare and Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

28.

Larsen, Ulla, Woo-Jin Chung, and Monica Das Gupta. 1998. “Fertility and Son Preference in Korea.” Population Studies 52.3: 317-325.

29.

Lewis, Jane, and Mary Campbell. 2007. “UK Work/Family Balance Policies and Gender Equality 1997–2005.” Social Politics 14: 4-30.

30.

Lutz, Wolfgang, Vegard Skirbekk, and Maria Rita Testa. 2006. “The Low-Fertility Trap Hypothesis: Forces That May Lead to Future Postponement and Fewer Births in Europe.” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 4: 167-192.

31.

Mason, Karen O., and Karen Khulthau. 1992. “The Perceived Impact of Child Care Costs on Women’s Labor Supply and Fertility.” Demography 29: 523-544.

32.

McDonald, Peter. 2000. “Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility.”Journal of Population Research 17: 1-16.

33.

Miettien, Anneli, Stuart Basten, and Anna Rotkirch. 2011. “Gender Equality and Fertility Intentions Revisited: Evidence from Finland.” Demographic Research 24: 469-496.

34.

Mitchell, Deborah, and Edith Gray. 2007. “Declining Fertility: Intentions, Attitudes and Aspirations.” Journal of Sociology 43.1: 23-44.

35.

Naldini, Manuela, and Teresa Jurado. 2009. “Families, Markets and Welfare States:The Southern European Model.” Paper presented at the 7th ESPAnet Conference, Urbino, September 19.

36.

OECD. 2012. “OECD Family Database.” Last modified November 23. http://www. oecd.org/social/family/database.

37.

Republic of Korea (ROK) Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2013. “Boyuk tonggye”(Childcare Statistics). http://www.bokjiro.go.kr/data/statusView.do?board_sid=297&data_sid=6008086.

38.

Rindfuss, Ronald, David K. Guilkey, S. Philip Morgan, and Øystein Kravdal. 2010. “Child-Care Availability and Fertility in Norway.” Population and Development Review 36: 725-748.

39.

Rindfuss, Ronald, David K. Guilkey, S. Philip Morgan, Øystein Kravdal, and Karen B. Guzzo. 2007. “Child Care Availability and First-Birth Timing in Norway.”Demography 44: 345-372.

40.

Shin, Jun-Bong. 2007. “Seoul sinsaenga 6 nyeonman-e neureotda” (Seoul, Increased Birthrate for the First Time in 6 Years). JoongAng Ilbo, January 19.

41.

Sleebos, Joëlle. 2003. “Low Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: Facts and Policy Responses.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 15. Paris: OECD.

42.

Spéder, Zsolt, and Balázs Kapitány. 2009. Ideational Factors and Parenthood: A Gender and Parity Specific Analysis in a Post-communist Society. Budapest:Budapest Demographic Research Institute, Hungarian Central Statistical Office.

43.

Statistics Korea. 2013. “Total Fertility Rates by Provinces.” Last modified January 10. http://www.kostat.go.kr.

44.

Torr, Berna, and Susan Short. 2004. “Second Births and the Second Shift: A Research Note on Gender Equity and Fertility.” Population and Development Review 30: 109-130.

45.

Yeom, Ji-Hye. 2013. “Chuga chulsan uihyang-e yeohyang-eul michineun yoin tamsaek”(Factors Affecting Additional Childbirth Intentions: Focusing on Gangnam-gu). Hanguk yeongyua boyukhak (Korea Journal of Child Care and Education)75: 43-63.

46.

Yoon, So-Young. 2005. “Jeochulsan gajeong-ui chulsanyul-gwa yeoseong chwieop gyeongheom” (An Analysis of the Fertility Rate and Women’s Employment in Lower Fertility Households). Hanguk gajeong gwalli hakhoe (Journal of Korean Home Management Association) 23: 59-166.

Korea Journal