바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Shin Yun-bok’s Duplex Criticism and the Loss of Confucian Ideology

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2014, v.54 no.1, pp.157-176
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2014.54.1.157

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The picturesque theme of Hyewon jeonsincheop 蕙園傳神帖 (Collected Paintings of Hyewon Shin Yun-bok) can best be described as a critical ridicule that makes use of the duplex placement technique. The duplicity of an abstract icon—whereby two opposing codes are conjoined with one abstract icon, i.e., one abstract icon implying two codes—is one of the more effective methods used to portray such a theme. For example, widows, yangban, Buddhist monks, ladies, female servants, and others are the original icons, but through anti-Confucian, antireligious, and amoral acts are construed as secondary abstract icons with lewd conduct, voyeurism, sexual harassment, aberration, and more. With the mechanism of the dual codes of one abstract icon, the criticism falls upon both of the two codes whereby Confucian ideology as doctrine and Confucian ideology as order (as implied by the icons) are lost. Shin did not just superficially express voyeuristic curiosity nor hedonic fantasy. His pictures include a certain critical mechanism, thus, there is much room to infer the spirit of the times in his world of painting.

keywords
Shin Yun-bok genre painting Confucianism icons and codes duplex placement technique

Reference

1.

Bowness, Alan. 1992. Modern European Art: From Impressionism to Abstraction. London: Thames and Hudson.

2.

Bush, Susan. 1971. The Chinese Literati on Painting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

3.

Cho, Han-uhk. 2000. Munhwa-ro bomyeon yeoksa-ga dallajinda (The Cultural Understanding of History). Seoul: Chaeksesang.

4.

Foucault, Michel. 1995. Igeot-eun paipeu-ga anida (This is Not a Pipe). Translated by Kim Hyeon. Seoul: Mineumsa.

5.

Gablik, Suzi. 1992. Magritte. Translated by Cheon Su-won. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.

6.

Gablik, Suzi. 2007. René Magritte. Translated by Cheon Su-won. Seoul: Sigong Art.

7.

Jin, Jae-kyo. 2008. “Joseonjo hugi munye gonggan-eseo seongjeok yongmang-ui bit-gwa geuneul” (Light and Shadow of Sexual Desires in Literary and Artistic Works of the Late Joseon Dynasty). Hanguk hanmunhak yeongu (Journal of Korean Literature in Hanmun) 42: 87-126.

8.

Kang, Myeong-gwan. 2008. “Joseon sidae-ui seong damnon-gwa seong” (Sexual Discourses and Sexuality in Late Joseon Period). Hanguk hanmunhak yeongu (Journal of Korean Literature in Hanmun) 42: 9-43.

9.

Kim, Kyoung-mi. 2008. “Joseon hugi seong damnon-gwa hanmun soseol-e jaehyeondoen seksyueolliti” (A Study of the Discourses and Representations of Sexuality in the Novels of 18th- and 19th-Century Joseon). Hanguk hanmunhak yeongu (Journal of Korean Literature in Hanmun) 42: 127-153.

10.

Korean Philosophical Association. 1987. Hanguk cheolhaksa (The History of Korean Philosophy). Vol. 2. Seoul: Dongmyeongsa.

11.

Lee, Dong-ju. 1995. Uri nara-ui yet geurim (Korean Paintings of the Past). Seoul:Hakgojae.

12.

Lim, Tae-seung. 2006a. Aikon-gwa kodeu (Icons and Codes). Seoul: Misulmunhwa.

13.

Lim, Tae-seung. 2006b. “Xujia wenren xianxiang-rujia meixue fanshi zai chaoxian houqi yishushehuixue li de yiyi he jiazhi 虚假文人现象-儒家美学范式在朝鲜后期艺术社会学里的意义和价值” (“Pseudo-literati” Phenomenon: The Significance and Values of the Paradigm of Confucian Aesthetics in Late Joseon Dynasty). Yougyo munhwa yeongu (Journal of Confucian Cultural Studies; International Edition) 6: 271-288.

14.

Lim, Tae-seung. 2012. “Ridicule through Lotus: The Anti-Confucian Discourse in Shin Yun-bok’s Painting Language.” Korea Journal 52.2: 116-135.

15.

Oh, Chang-seop. 2001. Igeot-eun uija-ga anida (This is Not a Chair). Seoul: Hong Design.

16.

Shin, Yun-bok. [n.d.] 1974. Hyewon jeonsincheop (Collected Paintings of Hyewon Shin Yun-bok). Seoul: Tamgudang.

17.

Weeks, Jeffrey. 2003. Sexuality. London and New York: Routledge.

18.

Yoo, Young-man. 2008. Sangsang hayeo? changjo hara! (Imagination? Creativity!). Seoul: Wisdom House.

Korea Journal