바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Online Learning Patterns and the Social Construction of U.S. Beef Imports in Korea: A Comparison of Three Online Communities

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2013, v.53 no.4, pp.107-140
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2013.53.4.107

(University of Salford)

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study examines the way that three groups of citizens (adolescents, housewives, and the politically active) socially constructed the mad-cow issue in Korea in 2008. In particular, the effects of political and social influences, group value systems, and online learning patterns are investigated. Quantitative data from three websites is combined with qualitative sources, including newspapers and online message boards. The results reveal that despite different learning patterns, adolescents focused on factual information while the other groups took a more interpretive approach, and all three groups initially constructed the issue as one of health security. However, following government announcements, politically active citizens came to see the issue through an anti-government lens. Rather than facilitating an improvement in understanding between the government and the politically active, government communication was instead the most influential external factor on the anti-government construction of the issue. This study suggests that active two-way communication between all parties involved, including the government, is needed to improve social learning, especially when it occurs in online communities.

keywords
mad-cow disease, online learning, social construction, adolescents, housewives, politically active citizens

Reference

1.

Ausubel, David P., Joseph D. Novak, and Helen Hanesian. 1968. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

2.

Axelrod, Robert, and Michael D. Cohen. 1999. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: Free Press.

3.

Bateson, Gregory. 1955. “A Theory of Play and Fantasy.” Psychiatric Research Reports 2: 39-51.

4.

Burmeister, Larry L., and Yong-Ju Choi. 2012. “Food Sovereignty Movement Activism in South Korea: National Policy Impacts?” Agriculture and Human Values 29.2: 247-258.

5.

Burr, Vivien. 1995. An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.

6.

Cho, Kisuk. 2009. “2008 Chotbul jiphoe chamyeoja-ui inyeomjeok jeonghyang: chinbuk banmi jusapa hogeun ban sinjayujuui” (The Ideological Orientation of 2008 Candlelight Vigil Participants: Anti-American, Pro-North Korean Left, or Anti-Neoliberalism). Hanguk jeongchi hakhoebo (Korean Political Science Review) 43.3: 125-148.

7.

Chung, Ji Bum. 2009. “Social Amplification of Risk: Learning Lessons from the U.S. Beef Crisis in Korea.” Paper presented at the Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Conference, Beijing, April 15-17.

8.

Dake, Karl. 1992. “Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk.” Journal of Social Issues 48.4: 21-37.

9.

Eom, Young-Sook. 2009. “Miguksan soegogi suip jaegae balpyo-e ttareun sobija husaeng sonsil cheukjeong” (Measuring Consumers’ Welfare Losses due to Announcement of Resuming U.S. Beef Imports). Jawon hwangyeong gyeongje yeongu (Environmental and Resource Economics Review) 18.3: 495-521.

10.

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 56-80.

11.

Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper and Row.

13.

Hong, Sung-gi. 2010. “A Look at the Changes in the Debate Structure in Korea through the Candlelight Vigils.” Korea Journal 50.3: 100-127.

14.

Isenberg, Daniel J. 1986. “Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50.6: 1141-1151.

15.

Jurenas, Remy, and Mark E. Manyin. 2010. “U.S.-South Korea Beef Dispute: Issues and Status.” Congresstional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress. Washington, DC.

16.

Kelleher, Colm A. 2004. Brain Trust: The Hidden Connection between Mad Cow and Misdiagnosed Alzheimer’s Disease. New York: Pocket Books.

17.

Kenny, Christopher. 1993. “The Microenvironment of Political Participation.” American Politics Quarterly 21.2: 223-238.

18.

Kim, Chul-kyoo, and Hae-Jin Lee. 2010. “Teenage Participants of the 2008 Candlelight Vigil: Their Social Characteristics and Changes in Political Views.” Korea Journal 50.3: 14-37.

19.

Kim, Young Ok. 2010. “Understanding the Candlelight Demonstration and Women’s Political Subjectivity through the Perspective of Changing Publicity.” Korea Journal 50.3: 38-70.

20.

Kitchen, David, and Douglas McDougall. 1999. “Collaborative Learning on the Internet.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 27.3: 245-258.

21.

Knoll, Kathleen, and Sirkka Jarvenpaa. 1995. “Learning to Work in Global Virtual Teams.” Paper presented at the 28th Hawaii International Conference of Systems Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, January 3-6.

22.

Kolb, David A., and Ronald E. Fry. 1975. “Toward an Applied Theory of Experiential Learning.” In Theories of Group Processes, edited by Cary L. Cooper, 33-58. London: John Wiley.

23.

König, Thomas. 2004. “CAQDAS in der Frame Analysis.” In Qualitative Datenanalyse: computergestützt, edited by Udo Kuckartz, Heiko Grunenberg, and Andreas Lauterbach, 89-96. Wiesbaden: VdS.

24.

Laister, Johann, and Sandra Kober. 2002. “Social Aspects of Collaborative Learning in Virtual Learning Environments.” Paper presented at the 2002 Networked Learning Conference, Sheffield, March 26-28.

25.

Lee, Chang-ho, and Jung Eui-cheol. 2009. “Gongnonjang-euroseoui inteonet kafe gesipan-ui ganeungseong-gwa hangye: jjukbbang keulleop-gwa yeopgi hogeun jinsil-eul jungsim-euro” (The Possibilities and Limitations of Internet Cafe Bulletin Boards as Public Spheres: Focusing on the Zzugbang Club and the Bizarre or Truth). Eollon gwahak yeongu (Journal of Communication Science) 9.3: 388-424.

26.

Lévy, Pierre. 1994. L’intelligence collective: pour une anthropologie du cyberspace. Paris: La Découverte.

27.

Miranda, Shaila M., and Carol S. Saunders. 2003. “The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing.” Information Systems Research 14.1: 87-107.

28.

Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1981. “Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context.” Advances in Consumer Research 8: 20-24.

29.

Riegner, Cate. 2007. “Word of Mouth on the Web: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Consumer Purchase Decisions.” Journal of Advertising Research 47.7: 436-447.

30.

Schifter, Deborah, and Martin A. Simon. 1992. “Assessing Teachers’ Development of a Constructivist View of Mathematics Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 8.2: 187-197.

31.

Schutz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

32.

Sieck, Winston, and J. Frank Yates. 1997. “Exposition Effects on Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70.3: 207-219.

33.

Stone, Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York and London: W. W. Norton.

34.

Suler, John. 2004. “The Online Disinhibition Effect.” Cyber Psychology and Behavior 7.3: 321-326.

35.

Webler, Thomas, and Seth Tuler. 2006. “Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision-making: Combined Results from Ten Case Studies.” Policy Studies Journal 34.4: 699-722.

36.

Weinberg, Alvin M. 1972. “Science and Trans-Science.” Minerva 10: 209-222.

37.

Yun, Seongyi, and Woo-Young Chang. 2010. “Political Participation of Teenagers in the Information Era.” Social Science Computer Review 29.2: 242-249.

Korea Journal