바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Conceptualization of the Individual as a Modern Subject in Korea: Analysis of Co-occurrence Relations

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2012, v.52 no.4, pp.12-35
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2012.52.4.12


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This article examines the conceptual development of gaein (individual) as a modern subject in Korea in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. It utilizes both quantitative and qualitative methods in order to analyze two different corpora: academic journal corpus (1896-1909) and Gaebyeok (Genesis) corpus (1920-1926). For this purpose, it focuses on the co-occurrence relations of gaein and other concepts, and builds a list of words that were frequently used near gaein in sentences. In addition, we have investigated in what context and for what reason the co-occurrences changed, and to what degree. By doing this, we found that the co-occurring rate of gaein with “state,” “law,” and “people,” decreased after the annexation of Korea by Japan, whereas the co-occurring rate with “society,” “nation,” “organization,” and “freedom” increased. We were able to conclude that while gaein was considered a member of a state in the enlightenment period, it developed into an economic and sociocultural subject in the 1920s.

keywords
gaein (individual) concept conceptual history modern subject corpus co-occurrence

Reference

1.

Akira, Yanabu 柳父章. 1982. Honyakugo seiritsu jijo 翻訳語成立事情(Conditions of the Formation of Translation Words). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

2.

Biber, Douglas. 1993. “Co-occurrence Patterns among Collocations: A Tool for Corpus-Based Lexical Knowledge Acquisition.” Computational Linguistics 19.3: 531-538.

3.

Choi, Su Il. 2008. Gaebyeok yeongu (A Study of Gaebyeok). Seoul: Somyong.

4.

Fukuzawa, Yukichi 福澤諭吉. [1875] 1962. Bunmeiron no gairyaku 文明論之槪略 (An Outline of a Theory of Civilization). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

5.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2001. “A Corpus-linguistic Analysis of -ic and -ical Adjectives.” ICAME Journal 25: 65-108.

6.

Jin, Guantao 金觀濤, and Liu Qingfeng 劉靑峰. . 2008. Gwanyeomsa-ran mueotinga(Studies on the History of Ideas). Vol. 1. Translated by Yang Ilmoet al. 2010. Seoul: Pureun Yeoksa.

7.

Kim, Hyun-ju. 2004. “1910 nyeondae gaein, sahoe gaenyeom-ui hyeongseonggwa byeonhwa: Yi Gwang-su-ui ‘mujeong’-eul jungsim-euro” (Individuality, Nationality, and the Politics of Sentiments in “Mujeong”). Hyeondae munhak-ui yeongu (Journal of Korean Modern Literature) 22: 260- 294.

8.

Kim, Hyun-ju. 2007. “Geundae gaenyeomeo yeongu-ui donghyang-gwa seonggwa”(The Trends and Results in the Study of Modem Concepts).Sangheo hakbo (Sangheo Journal) 19: 205-214.

9.

Kim, Hyun-ju. 2009. “1910 nyeondae cho maeil sinbo-ui sahoe damnon-gwa gonggongseong” (Society and Publicness in Maeil Sinbo in the 1910s). Hyeondae munhak-ui yeongu (Journal of Korean Modern Literature) 39: 235-273.

10.

Kim, Seog Gun. 2009. “19 segi mal “Individual” gaenyeom-ui suyong gwajeong- e daehayeo” (The Concept of “Individual” in the Nineteenth Century Korea). Segye jeongchi (Journal of World Politics) 24.1: 397-411.

11.

Koselleck, Reinhart. [1979] 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Translated by Keith Tribe. Cambridge: MIT Press.

12.

Koselleck, Reinhart. 1996. “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.” In The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, edited by Lehmann and Richter. Washington, D.C.: German Historical Institute.

13.

Kwon, Boduerae. 2007. “Geundae chogi minjok gaenyeom-ui byeonhwa: 1905-1910 nyeon daehan maeil sinbo-reul jungsim-euro” (The Concept of“Nation” in 1905-1910: Focused on Daehan maeil sinbo). Minjok munhaksayeongu (Journal of the History of the National Literature) 33: 188-212.

14.

Lee, Jeong Woo, and Yang Il Mo. 2006. “Geundaejeok gaein-ui tansaeng: iljeha soseoldeul-eseoui juche” (Birth of the Modern Individual: “Subject” in the Novels under the Japanese Rule). Sidae-wa cheolhak (Epoch and Philosophy) 17-4: 105-136.

15.

Lobscheid, William. [1866-1869] 1884. An English and Chinese Dictionary. Revised and enlarged by Tetsujiro Inoue. Tokyo: Fujimoto.

16.

McEnery, Tony, Xiao Richard, and Tono Yukio. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.

17.

Medhurst, Walter Henry. 1848. English and Chinese Dictionary. Shanghai: Mission Press.

18.

Morrison, Robert. 1822. A Dictionary of the Chinese Language. London: Black, Parbury, and Allen.

19.

Na, In Ho. 2011. Gaenyeomsa-ran mueot-inga (What is Conceptual History?). Seoul: Yeoksa Bipyeongsa.

20.

Park, Ju Won. 2004. “Geundaejeok gaein, sahoe gaenyeom-ui hyeongseonggwa byeonhwa” (The Formation and Change of the Modern Concepts of “Individual” and “Society”). Yeoksa bipyeong (Critical Review of History) 67: 207-238.

21.

Park, Myoungkyu. 2003. “1920 nyeondae ‘sahoe’ insik-gwa gaeinjuui” (The Perception of “Society” and Individualism in the 1920s). In Hanguk sahoe sasangsa yeongu (A Study of the History of Korean Social Thoughts), by Kim Kyung-il et al. Seoul: Nanam.

22.

So, Kang-chun. 2002. “Jeongbo cheori peurogeuraem-e daehayeo: SymKDPreul jungsim-euro” (About Information Processing Programs: With a Focus on SymKDP). In Hangugeo-wa jeongbohwa (The Korean Language and Informatization), by Hong Won-Pyo et al. Seoul: Taehaksa.

23.

Takayuki, Shibata, and Masahide Ishizuka. 2003. Tetsugaku shiso honyakugo jiten 哲學思想翻訳語事典(A Dictionary of Translated Philosophical Terms). Tokyo: Ronsosha.

24.

Yun, Heegu. 1909. “Heunghangnon” (How to Foster Academia). Giho heunghakhoe wolbo (Monthly of the Giho Society for the Promotion of Learning) 6 (January).

Korea Journal