바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 0023-3900

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.52 No.3
Citation Share

Profiles of Contemporary Korean Religions: The Emergence of Neo-Ethnicity

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2012, v.52 no.3, pp.9-34
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2012.52.3.9

(2012). Profiles of Contemporary Korean Religions: The Emergence of Neo-Ethnicity. Korea Journal, 52(3), 9-34, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2012.52.3.9
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This paper describes the religious culture of contemporary Korea. It rejects both the causal-normative debate of a standard historical approach and the hegemonic-normative debate of a cultural approach, attempting instead to synthesize facts that are made apparent by the present state. Based on the premise that Korea’s religious culture is in a multireligious state, I conceptualize the types of extant religions into central religions, which are deeply rooted in tradition, and peak religions, which exercise direct influence on contemporary society, to examine these religions’ intersecting teachings on peak-oriented and center-oriented attitudes. Then, I examine how relationships with political authority are formed based on understandings of contemporariness. A religion’s perception of its relations with politics can change depending on whether it considers contemporariness as a monoreligious, multireligious, or multicultural condition. Presently, however, the strata of each religion’s situational perception have been significantly and chaotically convoluted. Finally, I point out that religions are showing qualities of new ethnicity. I highlight the resulting inevitable inabilities of religions to communicate and the exclusion they derive, as well as the dynamism of exclusion, upon which religions build their trade value through mega growth, extremity, and convenience in the current state of multicultural markets.

keywords
consciousness of contemporariness, central and peak religions, trend of mega growth, trend of extremity, principle of convenience, neo-ethnicity

Reference

1.

Antes, Peter, Armin W. Geertz, and Randi R. Warne, eds. 2008. Regional, Critical, and Historical Approaches. Vol. 1 of New Approaches to the Study of Religion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

2.

Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

3.

Chung, Chin Hong. 2006. Yeollim-gwa dachim: inmunhakjeok sangsang-eul tonghan jonggyo munhwa ilkki (Opening and Closing: Reading Religious Culture through the Lens of Humanities Imagination). Seoul: Sancheoreom.

4.

Chung, Chin Hong. 2010. Jeongjikhan insik-gwa yeollin sangsangnyeok: jonggyo damnon-ui jiseongjeok gonggan-eul wihayeo (Honest Consciousness and Open Imagination: Toward an Intellectual Space of Religious Discourse). Seoul: Cheongnyeonsa.

5.

Hervieu-Léger, Danièle. 2008. “Religion as Memory: Reference to Tradition and the Constitution of a Heritage of Belief in Modern Societies.” In Religion: Beyond a Concept, edited by Hent de Vries, 245-258. New York: Fordham University Press.

6.

Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2009. “Nationalism and Religion.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion, edited by Robert A. Segal, 357-367. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

7.

McLoughlin, Seán. 2005. “Migration, Diaspora and Transmission: Transformations of Religion and Culture in a Globalising Age.” In The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, edited by John R. Hinnells, 526-546. Abingdon: Routledge.

8.

Scott, Joan Wallach. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

9.

ter Borg, Meerten B., and Jan Willem van Henten, eds. 2010. Powers: Religion as a Social and Spiritual Force. New York: Fordham University Press.

10.

Vásquez, Manuel A. 2011. More than Belief: A Materialist Theory of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Korea Journal

e-Submission OA Policy