바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Korean Perceptions of Japan during the Great Han Empire and the Japanese Annexation of Korea

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2011, v.51 no.4, pp.89-109
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2011.51.4.89

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

There might have been two ways through which Korea could have maintained independence despite what seemed a fait accompli. First, it could have gotten military assistance by forging an alliance with either Russia or Japan. But setting up an alliance with one side would have created animosity with the other side, thus making a war between Russia and Japan inevitable and colonization of Korea the outcome. The Independence Club stressed the importance of protective neutral status in order for the Great Han Empire to sustain its national sovereignty. The club desired balanced relations between Russia and Japan, but ended up believing that Russia held the greater danger for Korea. Their support of Japan, the United States, and Britain subsequently led to the strengthening of Japanese influence and encouraged a pro-Japanese atmosphere among Koreans. In the process, Japan’s influence grew as it ended up taking a mediating role between the Korean government and the Independence Club, opening the way for the Japanese colonization of Korea.

keywords
Independence Club, Emperor Gojong, Great Han Empire, neutral state, Japan, Russia

Reference

1.

Chu, Chinoh. 1986. “Dongnip hyeophoe-ui daeoe insik-ui gujo-wa jeongae” (Structure and Deployment of the Independence Club’s Understanding of Foreign Forces). Hangnim 8.

2.

Chu, Chinoh. 2010. “Cheongil jeonjaeng-ui joseon dongnimnon bipan” (A Critique of Japan’s Theory on Joseon Independence through the Sino-Japanese War). In vol. 2 of Hanil yeoksa-ui jaengjeom 2010 (Controversial Issues in the History of Korea and Japan in 2010), edited by Cho Gwang and Son Seung-cheol. Seoul: Gyeongin Publishing Co.

3.

Chu, Chinoh, Doh Myeonhoe, and Cho Jaegon. 2003. “Hanguk geundae jeongchisa-wa wanggwon” (Korean Modern Political History and Royal Authority). Yeoksa-wa hyeonsil (History and Reality) 50.

4.

Committee for the Compilation of Documents Relating to Ito Hirobumi (Ito Hirobumi Kankei Monjo Kenkyukai), ed. 1981. 『伊藤博文係文書』(Documents Relating to Ito Hirobumi). Tokyo: Hanawa Shobo.

5.

Jeong, Gyo. [1897] 2004. Daehan gyenyeonsa (The History of Late Daehan). Vol. I. Seoul: Somyoung Publishing.

6.

Lee, Min-won. 1994. “Agwan pacheon jeonhu-ui halleo gwangye, 1895-1898” (Korea-Russia Relation After the Agwan Pacheon, 1895-1898). PhD diss., The Academy of Korean Studies.

7.

Lee, Sincheol, et al. 2008. Nyu raiteu wiheomhan gyogwaseo baro ilgi (Correct Reading of the New Right’s Dangerous Textbooks). Seoul: Seohae Munjip.

8.

Republic of Korea, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1960. Guhanmal oegyo munseo (Diplomatic Documents in Late Korean Empire). Vol. 4. Seoul: Republic of Korea, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

9.

Moriyama, Shigenori. 1987. 『近代日韓關係史硏究』(A Study of the Modern History of the Japan-Korea Relations). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

10.

Park, Chan Seung. 1992. Hanguk geundae jeongchi sasangsa yeongu (A Study of the Korean Modern Political Thoughts). Seoul: Yeoksa Bipyeogsa.

11.

Song, Byungki. 1976. “Gwangmu gaehyeok yeongu: geu seonggyeok-eul jungsim-euro” (A Study of the Gwangmu Reform: With a Focus on Its Characteristics). Sahakji (Journal of History) 10.

12.

Suh, Young-hee. 2003. Daehan jeguk jeongchisa yeongu (Studies on Politics of the Great Han Empire). Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

13.

Synn, Seung-Kwon. 1981. The Russo-Japanese Rivalry over Korea 1876-1904. Seoul: Yuk Phub Sa.

14.

Yi, Tae-Jin, et al. 2005. Gojong hwangje yeoksa cheongmunhoe (Historical Hearings of Emperor Gojong). Seoul: Pureun Yeoksa.

15.

Yoshida, Kazuki. 1966. 「日英同盟と朝鮮侵略」(Japan-Britain Alliance and Aggression of Joseon). 『日本史硏究』(Journal of Japanese History) 84.

Korea Journal