바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Configuring the New Topography of Korea’s Professional Interest Group Politics: An Investigation into the Declining Power of Organized Medicine in Health Politics

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2011, v.51 no.1, pp.176-210
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2011.51.1.176

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to spell out the changing landscape of Korea’s professional interest group politics through an investigation into the factors that brought about a reduction in the monopolistic power of organized medicine in Korean health politics. To this end, the article first debates two theories concerning organized interests and their relationship with the government—pluralism and corporatism—and then summarizes changes in the Korean healthcare subsystem. The forces that made possible the role of the Korean Medical Association (KMA) as the sole representative of medical interests are also detailed. The main part of this article strives to use diverse angles to illuminate the principal factors that brought about the decline of the KMA’s monopolistic power: the environmental context, the changing relationship between the government and the KMA, health policy changes, and the KMA’s internal affairs.

keywords
professional interest group organized medicine Korean Medical Association (KMA)

Reference

1.

Ainsworth, Scott H. 2002. Analyzing Interest Group. New York: W. W. Norton.

2.

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press.

3.

Buzo, Adrian. 2002. The Making of Modern Korea. London: Routledge.

4.

Cawson, Alan. 1986. Corporatism and Political Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.

5.

Cha, Heung Bong. 2006. Uiyak buneop jeongchaek gwajeong (Policy Process in the Separation of Prescribing and Dispensing of Medicines). Seoul: Jipmoondang.

6.

Cho, Byong Hee. 2001. “Bogeon uiryo bunya-e isseoseo simin danche-ui yeokhal-gwa gwaje” (Roles and Tasks of Civic Groups in the Health Care Sector). Bogeon-gwa sahoe gwahak (Health Care and Social Science) 10: 5-35.

7.

Cho, Byong Hee. 2006. Jilbyeong-gwa uiryo-ui sahoehak (Sociology of Diseases and Medicines). Seoul: Jipmoondang.

8.

Choi, Jong Kyun. 2003. “Democratization and the Political Welfare Reform.” PhD diss., Kent University, UK.

9.

Chun, Chang Bae. 2005. “Two Paths of Healthcare Reforms: Korea and the United States.” PhD diss., Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea.

10.

Cochran, Clarke E. 2003. American Public Policy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworthy/Thomson.

11.

Cockerham, William C. 2003. Medical Sociology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

12.

Gould, Arthur. 2001. Developments in Swedish Social Policy: Resisting Dionysus. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

13.

Hill, Michael. 2005. The Public Policy Process. London: Pearson Education.

14.

Kihl, Young Whan. 2005. Transforming Korean Politics: Democracy, Reform and Culture. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

15.

Kim, Hun Jin. 2003. “An Analysis of the Policymaking Process of the National Health Insurance Scheme in the Republic of Korea.” PhD diss., Edinburgh University, UK.

16.

Kim, Soon-yang. 2006. “The Politics of Health Insurance Reform in Korea: Institutions, Policy Networks and Policy Outputs.” PhD diss., The London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

17.

Kim, Sun Hyuk. 2000. Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

18.

Kim, Young Myung. 2003. Hanguk hyeondae jeongchisa (The History of Modern Korean Politics). Seoul: Eulyoo Publishing Co.

19.

Kim, Young Soo. 2004. Simin danche-ui galdeung jungjae yeokhal (Conflict Mediation of Civic Groups). Seoul: Korea Studies Institute.

20.

Korean Medical Association (KMA). 1979. Daehan uihak hyeophoe chilsimnyeonsa (The 70 Years of Korean Medical Association). Seoul: KMA .

21.

Kwon, Soon Man. 2002. “Achieving Health Insurance for All: Lessons from the Republic of Korea.” ESS Paper No.1, International Labour Organization.

22.

Lee, Kyong Hee, and Kwon Soon Man. 2004. “Uiyak buneop jeongchaek: iik jipdan-ui yeonghyang-gwa jeongchaek gwajeong-ui gyohun” (The Separation of Prescribing and Dispensing Medicines: Influence of Interest Groups and Lessons of Policy Process). Hanguk jeongchaekhak hoebo (Korean Policy Studies Review) 13.5: 255-277.

23.

Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (MHSA), Republic of Korea. 1991. Bogeon bokji baekseo (MHSA White Book). Seoul: MHSA.

24.

Minnich, Daniel J. 2003. “Corporatism and Income Inequality in the Global Economy.” European Journal of Political Research 42: 23-53.

25.

Mundo, Phillip. A. 1992. Interest Groups: Cases and Characteristics. Chicago, Il: Nelson-Hall Inc.

26.

Parsons, Wayne. 2003. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Prac-tice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

27.

Shively, W. Philips. 2003. Power Choice. New York: McGraw Hill.

28.

Smith, Martin J. 1993. Pressure, Power and Policy: State Autonomy and Policy Networks in Britain and the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

29.

Truman, David. 1971. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

30.

Walt, Gill. 1994. Health Policy: An Introduction to Process and Power. London: Zed Books.

31.

Watts, Duncan. 2007. Pressure Groups. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

32.

Williamson, Peter J. 1989. Corporatism in Perspective. London: Sage Publications.

33.

Wilsford, David. 1991. Doctors and the State: The Politics of Health Care in France and the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

34.

Wong, Joseph. 2004. Health Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

35.

Yishai, Yael. 1992. “From an Iron Triangle to an Iron Duet?: Health Policymaking in Israel.” European Journal of Political Research 21: 91-108.

36.

Young, Brigitte. 1990. “Does the American Dairy Industry Fit the Meso-corporatist Model?” Political Studies 38.1: 72-82.

Korea Journal