- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN0023-3900
- E-ISSN2733-9343
- A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI
ISSN : 0023-3900
Several Present Conditions Defining 100 Years of Japan’s Annexation of Korea
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
There are two approaches to questioning the 100th anniversary since Japan’s annexation of Korea. One is to seek ways of overcoming colonialism by duly understanding the process of colonial domination from its outset through the present. Another approach is to position Japan’s annexation of Korea in current circumstances. This study has opted for the second approach. Over the past 100 years, conditions surrounding the matter of Japan’s colonial domination have noticeably changed. Above all, changes in the circumstances defining the relationships between Korea and Japan made inevitable the mention of colonial domination amidst other issues. From the Korean perspective, the fact that what was a single entity 100 years ago has been divided into two is the most fundamental change that has occurred. With this as a starting point, the current paper proposes to address three factors present in the 100 years following Japan’s annexation of Korea. First, the Japanese government’s apologetic statement for colonial domination is combined with the conception of an East Asian community. Second, the framework of perceiving the Korea-Japan relationship and the East Asian community should have a common ground. Lastly, the author also viewed the emergence of China as an essential reason for changes in order of the region in East Asia and the principal condition in defining the present state of affairs.
- keywords
- 100 years of Japan’s annexation of Korea, East Asian community, confederation, modernity
Reference
Arrighi, Giovanni. 2009. Beijing-ui aedeom smiseu—21 segi-ui gyebo (Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century). Translated by Kang Jin A. Seoul: Gil Publishing. Originally published as Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century (London: Verso, 2007).
Bae, Geung-Chan. 2009. “Dongasia jiyeok hyeomnyeok-ui jeongae gwajeong” (The Process of Development in East Asian Regional Cooperation). In Dongasia gongdongche-wa hanguk-ui mirae (The East Asian Community and the Future of Korea), edited by the Society for the Study of East Asia Community. Seoul: Imagine.
Baek, Seung Wook. 2006. Jabonjuui yeoksa gangui (Lecture on History of Capitalism). Seoul: Greenbee Publishers.
Baek, Nak-Chung. 2010. “Dongasia gongdongche gusang-gwa hanbando” (The Conception of East Asian Community and the Korean Peninsula). Yeoksa bipyeong (Critical Review of History) 92.
Cho, Young Nam. 2009. 21 segi jungguk-i ganeun gil (China’s Road in the 21st Century). Seoul: Nanam.
Chun, Sung-Heung. 2005. “Jungguk jabonjuui-ui baljeon-gwa segye jeongchieseoui wisang” (The Development of Chinese Capitalism and Its Position in World Politics). Sahoe gwahak yeongu (Social Science Studies) 13.2.
Cui, Zhiyuan 崔之元. 2010. 「"重庆经验" 进行时 如何理解重庆经验的普遍意□」(The “Chongqing Experience” in Progress: The Universal Significance of the Chongqing Experience). 『求是论坛』(Truth Forum), September 16. http://bbs.qstheory.cn/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=35927&from=recommend_f.
Fan, Wei 潘維. 2009. 「當代中華體制」(Contemporary Chinese System). In 『中國模式』(Chinese Model), edited by Fan Wei. Beijing: Zhongyang Fanyi Chubanshe.
Jeon, Hyungkwon. 2006. “Dongbuga sojiyeok hyeomnyeok-gwa jiyeok geobeoneonseu-ui deungjang” (Sub regional Cooperation in East Asia and Emergence of Regional Governance in East Asia). Gukje jeongchi nonchong (Korean Journal of International Relations) 46.4: 189-198.
Kang, Jin A. 2008. “Dong asia-ro dasi sseun segyesa” (History of World from the East Asian Perspective). Yeoksa bipyeong (Critical Review of History) 82.
Kang, Sungho. 2008. “Jeon jigujeok segye cheje-ro bon segyesa-wa dongasiasa: andeure gundeo frankeu” (History of East Asia Viewed in the Framework of Pan-World System: Andre Gunder Frank). Yeoksa bipyeong (Critical Review of History) 82.
Kim, Kee Seok. 2007. “1990 nyeondae dongasia jiyeokjuui-wa hanil gwangye” (Regionalism in East Asia in the 1990s and Korea-Japan Relationships). Sahoe gwahak yeongu (Social Science Studies) 46.1: 6-8.
____________. 2010. “Sin gondongche gusang-gwa sin asia oegyo” (Conception of New Community and New Asian Diplomacy). JPI jeongchaek poreom (JPI Policy Forum).
Koo, Kab-Woo. 2008. Gukje gwangyehak bipan (Criticism of International Relations Science). Seoul: Humanitas.
Lee, Jae Hyon. 2009. “Dongasia jiyeok hyeomnyeok-gwa yeongnae rodeoswip” (East Asian Regional Cooperation and Leadership). In Dongasia gongdongche-wa hanguk-ui mirae (East Asian Community and The Future of Korea), edited by the Society for the Study of East Asia Community. Seoul: Imagine.
Lee, Moonki. 2008. “WTO sidae jungguk-ui baljeon paereodaim sujeong-gwa jungguk model-ui mosaek” (Revision of China’s Development Paradigm in the WTO Age and Search for Chinese Model). Donga yeongu (Studies of East Asia) 54.
Lee, Namju. 2010. “Bukjung gyeongje hyeomnyeok-gwa hanbando gyeongje” (North Korea-China Economic Cooperation and Economy of the Korean peninsula). Changbi jugan nonpyeong (Changbi Weekly Commentary), September 29 (http://weekly.changbi.com).
Lee, Namju, ed. 2009. Ijung gwajeron (A Dual Project View). Seoul: Changbi Publishers.
Lee, Namju, and Bae Ki-chan. 2009. “Dongasia gongdongche chujin-gwa minjokjuui geukbok bangan” (Spearheading the East Asian Community and Ways of Overcoming Nationalism). In Dongasia gongdongche nonuiui hyeonhwang-gwa jeonmang (The Status and View of Discussion on East Asian Community), edited by the Northeast Asia History Foundation. Seoul: Northeast Asia History Foundation.
Lee, Sook-Jong, et al. 2009. “Han-jung-il-ui dongasia insik-gwa dongasia gongdongche jeongchaek” (Korean, Chinese, and Japanese Perceptions of East Asia and East Asian Community Policy). In Dongasia gongdongche nonui-ui hyeonhwang-gwa jeonmang (The Status and Future Implications of Discussions on the East Asian Community), edited by the Northeast Asia History Foundation. Seoul: Northeast Asia History Foundation.
Na, Jongseok, et al. 2009. “Dongasia gongdongche-ui jeongcheseong hyeongseong-ui munje” (The Issue of Shaping of Identity of the East Asian Community). In Dongasia gongdongche nonui-ui hyeonhwang-gwa jeonmang (The Status and View of Discussion on East Asian Community), edited by the Northeast Asia History Foundation. Seoul: Northeast Asia History Foundation.
Ramo, Joshua Cooper. 2004. The Beijing Consensus. London: Foreign Policy Center.
Ryu, Junpil. 2009. “Bundan chejeron-gwa dongasia ron” (Discourses of the National Division System and East Asia). Asea yeongu (Journal of Asiatic Studies) 138.
Sakamoto, Yoshikatsu. 2009. “21 segi-e dongasia gongdongche-ga ganneun uimi” (The Significance of the East Asian Community in the 21st Century). Changjak-gwa bipyeong (Creation and Criticism) 136 (winter).
Shin, Yoon Hwan. 2009. “Dongnama-ui jiyeokjuui-wa dongasia gondongche” (Regionalism in Southeast Asia and East Asian community). Donga yeongu (Studies of East Asia) 56.
Su, Wei □伟. 2010. “薄熙来新政与重庆模式” (Bo Xilai, the New Deal And Chongqing Model). http://www.wyzxsx.com/Article/Class4/201007/166806.html.
Wada, Haruki. 2004. Dongbuk asia gongdong-ui jip (Common House of East Asia). Translated by Lee Won-Duk. Seoul: Ilchokak Publishing Co.
Yao, Yang. 2010. “Can China’s Model of Authoritarian Growth Survive?” In Foreign Affairs (February).
Yi, Seong-Woo. 2010. “Dumangang gaebal-gwa dongasia daja hyeonmyeokui jeonmang” (Development of the Tumen River Area and Prospects for Multilateral Cooperation in East Asia). JPI jeongchaek poreom (JPI Policy Forum).
Yonetani, Masafumi 米谷匡史. 2010. Asia ilbon (Asia/Japan). Translated by Jo Eun-Mi. Seoul: Greenbee Publishers. Originally published as 『アジア/日本』 (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2006).
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations