바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Teenage Participants of the 2008 Candlelight Vigil: Their Social Characteristics and Changes in Political Views

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2010, v.50 no.3, pp.14-37
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2010.50.3.14


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The current research attempts to investigate the questions of who the participants in the candlelight vigil of 2008 were and how they have changed over time. In order to answer these questions, we used survey data collected in June 2008, which was used as a basis for follow-up research of the same respondents in September 2008 and July 2009. In the first part of our analysis, we examine the general characteristics of the participant teens. We found that the participants were not very different from nonparticipant teens in terms of their social background, such as class identity and GPAs. In the latter part of the paper, we analyze how the teens evaluated the candlelight vigil after one year. We found that the participants tend to define themselves as the “candlelight generation” and share a strong feeling of “we-ness.” It was also found that the respondents were strongly influenced by the experience of participating in the candle protest in terms of political consciousness.

keywords
candlelight vigil, American beef import, teen politics, candle generation, social movement

Reference

1.

Amizade, Ronald R., and Doug McAdam. 2001. “Emotions and Contentious Politics.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by Amizade et al., 14-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2.

Choi, Jang Jip. 2008. “Chotbul jiphoe-ga jegihaneun hanguk minjujuui-ui gwaje” (Issues of Democracy in Korea Raised by the Candlelight Vigil). Paper presented at the symposium on “The Candlelight Vigil and Democracy in Korea,” June 16.

3.

Fendrich, James M., and Kenneth L. Lovoy. 1988. “Back to the Future: Adult Political Behavior of Former Political Activists.” American Sociological Review 53: 780-784.

4.

Giugni, Marco G. 2004. “Personal and Biographical Consequences.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movement, edited by David Snow, Sarah Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 489-507. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

5.

Gould, Deborah B. 2004. “Passionate Political Process: Bringing Emotions Back into the Study of Social Movements.” In Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion, edited by Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper, 155-175. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

6.

Hong, Seong Tae. 2009. “Chotbul jiphoe-wa minjujuui” (The Candlelight Vigil and Democracy). In Chotbul jiphoe-wa hanguk sahoe (The Candlelight Vigil and Korean Society), edited by Hong Seong Tae, 17-55. Seoul: Munhwa Kwahaksa.

7.

Hunt, Scott A., and Robert D. Benford. 2004. “Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movement, edited by David Snow, Sarah Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 433-451. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

8.

Jo, Jeong-hwan. 2009. Minereuba-ui chotbul (Candles of Minerva). Seoul: Galmuri.

9.

Kang, Nae-Hui. 2009. “Chotbul jeongguk-gwa sinjayujuui” (Candlelight Politics and Neo-liberalism). In Chotbul jiphoe-wa hanguk sahoe (The Candlelight Vigil and Korean Society), edited by Hong Seong Tae, 95-126. Seoul: Munhwa Kwahaksa.

10.

Kim, Chul-Kyoo, and Kim Sunup. 2009. “The Chotbul jiphoe-wa meokgeori jeoungchi” (The Candlelight Vigil of 2008 and Food Politics). Nongchon sahoe (Journal of Rural Society) 19.2: 37-61.

11.

Kim, Chul-Kyoo, et al. 2010. “Chotbul jiphoe sipdae chamyeoja-ui jeongcheseong-gwa sahoe uisik-ui byeonhwa” (Changing Social Attitudes of Teenage Participants of the 2008 Candlelight Vigil). Gyeongje-wa sahoe (Economy and Society) 85: 265-290.

12.

Kim, Chul-Kyoo, Kim Sunup, and Lee Cheol. 2008. “Chotbul jiphoe-wa 10 dae chamyeojadeul-ui sahoejeok teukseong” (The Social Characteristics of Teenage Participants in the Candlelight Protests). In Chotbul jiphoewa hanguk sahoe (The Candlelight Vigil and Korean Society), edited by Hong Seong Tae, 129-163. Seoul: Munhwa Kwahaksa.

13.

Kim, Chul-Kyoo, and Seo Seong Jin. 2009. “Chotbul sonyeo, sinhwa-wa hyeonsil” (Candle Girls, Myth and Reality). Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Critical Sociology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, October 31.

14.

Kim, Ho-Ki. 2008. “Chukje-eseo jeohang-euro?” (From Festival to Resistance?). Paper presented at the symposium on “Political and Social Meaning of the Candlelight Vigil,” National Human Rights Commission of Korea, Seoul, June 7.

15.

Kim, Young Ok. 2009. “Yeoseongjuui gwanjeom-eseo bon chotbul jiphoe-wa yeoseong-ui jeongchijeok jucheseong” (The Candlelight Vigil and Political Subjectivity of Women from the Feminist Perspective). Asia yeoseong yeongu (Journal of Asian Women) 48.2: 7-34.

16.

Klandermans, Bert. 1997. The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

17.

____________. 2004. “The Demand and Supply of Participation: Social-Psychological Correlates of Participation in Social Movement.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movement, edited by David Snow, Sarah Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 360-379. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

18.

Klandemans, Bert, and Jackie Smith. 2002. “Survey Research: A Case for Comparative Designs.” In Methods of Social Movement Research, edited by Bert Klandermans and Suzanne Staggenborg, 3-31. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

19.

Lee, Chang-Ho. 2009. “Chotbul siwi-wa inteonet, geurigo cheongsonyeon-ui sahoe chamyeo” (The Candlelight Vigil, Internet, and Youth Social Participation). In Chotbul jiphoe-wa hanguk sahoe (The Candlelight Vigil and Korean Society), edited by Hong Seong Tae, 216-252. Seoul: Munhwa Kwahaksa.

20.

Lee, Hae-Jin. 2009. “Chotbul jiphoe 10-dae chamyeojadeul-ui chamyeo gyeongheomgwa juche hyeongseong” (The Experiences and Subject Formation of the Teenage Participants of the Candlelight Protests). In Chotbul jiphoe-wa hanguk sahoe (The Candlelight Vigil and Korean Society), edited by Hong Seong Tae, 164-215. Seoul: Munhwa Kwahaksa.

21.

Lim, Hy-Sop. 1999. Jiphap haengdong-gwa sahoe undong-ui iron (Theories of Collective Behavior and Social Movements). Seoul: Korea University Press.

22.

McAdam, Doug. 1988. Freedom Summer: The Idealists Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

____________. 1989. “The Biographical Consequence of Activism.” American Sociological Review 54.5: 744-760.

24.

Melucci, Alberto. 1995. “The Process of Collective Identity.” In Social Movement and Culture, edited by Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

25.

Planning Commission of the Dangdae Bipyeong (PCDB). 2009. Geudae-neun wae chotbul-eul kkeusyeonnayo? (Why Did You Put Out Your Candlelight?). Seoul: Sanchaekja.

26.

Polletta, Francesca, and James M. Jasper. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283-305.

27.

Rancière, Jacques. 2010. “Minjujuui-e matseoneun minjujuuideul” (Democracies Fighting against Democracy). In Minjujuui-neun jugeonneunga? (Was Democracy Dead?), translated by Sang Woon Kim et al. Seoul: Nanjang. Originally published as Démocratie, dans quel état? (Paris: La Fabrique, 2009).

28.

Schuman, Howard, and Jacqueline Scott. 1989. “Generations and Collective Memories.” American Sociological Review 54.3: 359-381.

Korea Journal