바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Democratic Benefits of Devolution: A Comparison of South Korea and the United States

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2010, v.50 no.2, pp.183-206
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2010.50.2.183
Brian E. ADAMS (San Diego State University)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

One argument made in favor of devolution of policy authority to local governments is that it will promote citizen participation by moving decision-making authority “closer” to the people. This paper examines the merits of this argument:will increasing local autonomy have the desired effect of enhancing citizen participation? Based on an examination of citizen participation in the United States and South Korea, I find that even though local governments are not inherently more responsive or open to citizen influence, devolution has democratic benefits because it allows for different types and forms of citizen activity that are limited on the national level. Devolution creates participatory spaces that, if utilized, could enhance civic learning and governmental responsiveness.

keywords
devolution, policy making, local autonomy, Korean local governments, governmental responsiveness, citizen participation

Reference

1.

Adams, Brian E. 2004. “Public Meetings and the Democratic Process.” Public Administration Review 64.1: 43-54.

2.

____________. 2007. Citizen Lobbyists: Local Efforts to Influence Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

3.

Ahn, Chung-Si. 2005. “National Democracy and Local Governance: Appraising a Decade of Local Democracy in South Korea.” In New Development in Local Democracy and Decentralization in East Asia, edited by Chung-Si Ahn. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

4.

Bae, Yooil, and Jefferey M. Sellers. 2007. “Globalization, the Development, State and the Politics of Urban Growth in Korea: A Multilevel Analysis.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31.3: 543-560.

5.

Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

6.

Bardhan, Pranab, and Dilip Mookherjee, eds. 2006. Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries. Cambridge: MIT Press.

7.

Briffault, Richard. 1990a. “Our Localism: Part II-Localism and Legal Theory.” Columbia Law Review 90.2: 346-454.

8.

____________. 1990b. “Our Localism: Part I-The Structure of Local Government Law.” Columbia Law Review 90.1: 1-115.

9.

Campbell, Tim. 2003. The Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation in Latin American Cities. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

10.

Caren, Neal. 2007. “Big City, Big Turnout? Electoral Participation in American Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29.1: 31-46.

11.

Center for Civil Society with Comparative Perspective. 2006. Research Survey of Political Society in a Multi-cultural and Pluri-generational World. http://www.coe-ccc.keio.ac.jp/data_archive_en/csw/2007_00_outline_en.pdf.

12.

Hahm, Chaibong. 2008. “South Korea’s Miraculous Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 19.3: 128-142.

13.

Chang, Woo-Young, and Won-Tae Lee. 2006. “Cyberactivism and Political Empowerment in Civil Society: A Comparative Analysis of Korean Cases.” Korea Journal 46.4: 136-167.

14.

Checkoway, Barry. 1981. “The Politics of Public Hearings.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17.4: 566-582.

15.

Cho, Dae-Yop. 2006. “Korean Citizens’ Movement Organizations: Their Ideologies, Resources, and Action Repertoires.” Korea Journal 46.2: 68-98.

16.

Chung, Chulhee. 1997. “Social Movement Organizations and the June Uprising.” Korea Journal 37.1: 81-97.

17.

Clark, Gordon L. 1984. “A Theory of Local Autonomy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74.2: 195-208.

18.

____________. 1985. Judges and the Cities: Interpreting Local Autonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

19.

Cole, Richard L., and David Caputo. 1984. “The Public Hearing as an Effective Citizen Participation Mechanism: A Case Study of the General Revenue Sharing Program.” American Political Science Review 78: 404-416.

20.

Dahl, Robert A. 1967. “The City in the Future of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 61.4: 953-970.

21.

Diamond, Larry, and Doh Chull Shin, eds. 2000. Institutional Reform and Democratic Consolidation in Korea. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

22.

Dreier, Peter, John Mollenkopf, and Todd Swanstrom. 2001. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-first Century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

23.

Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

24.

Elkin, Stephen L. 1985. “Twentieth Century Urban Regimes.” Journal of Urban Affairs 7: 11-28.

25.

Fiorina, Morris P. 1999. “Extreme Voices: A Dark Side of Civic Engagement.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina. Washington D.C.: Brookings.

26.

Frug, Gerald E. 1980. “The City as a Legal Concept.” Harvard Law Review 93.6: 1057-1154.

27.

____________. 1999. City Making: Building Communities without Building Walls. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

28.

Grodzins, Morton. 1966. The American System: A New View of Government in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.

29.

Hajnal, Zoltan L., and Paul G. Lewis. 2003. “Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38.5: 645-668.

30.

Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

31.

Hwang, Ah-Ran. 2006. “Voters and Parties in Local Elections: 1995-2006.” Korea Journal 46.4: 33-61.

32.

Jefferson, Thomas. 1999. Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Kang, Jung In. 2000. “Some Reflections on Recent Democratization in South Korea.” Korea Journal 40.2: 195-224.

34.

Kang, Myung-goo. 2006. “Globalization of the Economy and Localization of Politics? Restructuring the Development State via decentralization in Korea.” Korea Journal 46.4: 87-114.

35.

Kelleher, Christine, and David Lowery. 2004. “Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts.” Urban Affairs Review 39.6: 720-757.

36.

Kihl, Young Whan. 2005. Transforming Korean Politics: Democracy, Reform, and Culture. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

37.

Kim, Andrew Eungi. 2006. “Civic Activism and Korean Democracy: The Impact of Blacklisting Campaigns in the 2000 and 2004 General Elections.” The Pacific Review 19.4: 519-542.

38.

Kim, Dong-Choon. 2006. “Growth and Crisis of the Korean Citizens’ Movement.” Korea Journal 46.2: 99-128.

39.

Kim, Hyuk-Rae. 2000. “The State and Civil Society in Transition: The Role of Non-governmental Organizations in South Korea.” The Pacific Review 13.4: 595-613.

40.

Kim, Ik-Sik. 2002. “Saturday Date with the Mayor.” In Building Good Governance: Reforms in Seoul, edited by Marc Holzer and Byong-Joon Kim. Seoul: National Center for Public Productivity and the Seoul Development Institute.

41.

Kim, Pan Suk. 2007. “Development of Korean NGOs and Governmental Assistance to NGOs.” In Good Local Autonomy & Governance, edited by Eung-Kyuk Park and Walter Klitz. Seoul: Center for Local Autonomy and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation.

42.

Kim, Samuel S., ed. 2003. Korea’s Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Kim, Sunhyuk. 2000. The Politics of Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

44.

____________. 2006. “Civil Society and Local Democracy.” Korea Journal 46.4: 62-86.

45.

____________. 2009. “Civic Engagement and Democracy in South Korea.” Korea Observer 40.1: 1-26.

46.

Krane, Dale, Platon N. Rigos, and Melvin B. Hill Jr. 2001. Home Rule in America: A Fifty State Handbook. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

47.

Lee, Eun-Jin. 2006. “Local Self-Governance and the Citizens’ Movement.” Korea Journal 46.2: 129-154.

48.

Lee, Jong Soo. 1996. “The Politics of Decentralisation in Korea.” Local Government Studies 22.3: 60-71.

49.

Lee, Namhee. 2007. The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

50.

Lee, Shi-Chul. 2007. “Recent Decentralization Challenges in Korea: Repertoire, Reality, and Reshaping.” International Review of Public Administration 11.2: 1-13.

51.

Lee, Yoonkyung. 2009. “Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Social Movements for Democratic Representation in Korea.” Korea Observer 40.1: 27-52.

52.

Logan, John R., and Harvey L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

53.

Lovell, Catherine H. 1981. “Evolving Local Government Dependency.” Public Administration Review 41: 189-202.

54.

Manor, James. 1999. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

55.

Mill, John Stuart. 1951. Utilitarianism, Liberty, and Representative Government. New York: E. F. Dutton and Company.

56.

Mueller, John. 1999. Capitalism, Democracy & Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

57.

Park, Chan Wook. 2005. “Local Elections and Local Political Elites in Democratizing Korea: Assessing Political Dynamics and Performance.” In New Development in Local Democracy and Decentralization in East Asia, edited by Chung-Si Ahn. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

58.

Park, Chong-Min. 2003. “Quality of Local Government and Democratic Citizenship.” Social Indicators Research 62.1: 291-319.

59.

____________. 2006. “Local Governance and Community Power in Korea.” Korea Journal 46.4: 9-32.

60.

Park, Eung Kyuk. 2007. “The Change and Development of Local Self-Government in Korea: From Centralization to Decentralization.” In Good Local Autonomy & Governance, edited by Eung-Kyuk Park and Walter Klitz. Seoul: Center for Local Autonomy and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation.

61.

Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

62.

Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. 1977. Poor Peoples Movements: Why They Succeed and How They Fail. New York: Pantheon.

63.

Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Shuster.

64.

Riker, William H., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62.1: 25-42.

65.

Rowe, Gene, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 25.1: 3-29.

66.

Rusk, David. 2003. Cities without Suburbs. 3rd edition. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

67.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

68.

Seong, Kyoung-Ryung. 2000. “Delayed Decentralization and Incomplete Democratic Consolidation.” In Institutional Reform and Democratic Consolidation in Korea, edited by Larry Diamond and Doh Chull Shin. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

69.

Shin, Kwang-Yeong. 2006. “The Citizens’ Movement in Korea.” Korea Journal 46.2: 5-34.

70.

Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

71.

Sohn, Bong-Scuk, and Chung-Si Ahn. 2005. “Citizen Participation in South Korea’s Local Governments: 1991-2002.” In New Development in Local Democracy and Decentralization in East Asia, edited by Chung-Si Ahn. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

72.

Stone, Clarence N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

73.

Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and John R. Hibbing. 2005. “Citizenship and Civic Engagement.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 227-249.

74.

Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1835/2003. Democracy in America. Repr. New York: Penguin Books.

75.

Treisman, Daniel. 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

76.

Turner, Mark. 1999. “Central-Local Relations: Themes and Issues.” In Central-Local Relations in Asia-Pacific, edited by Mark Turner. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

77.

Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2009. Radical Democracy in the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

78.

Wood, Curtis. 2002. “Voter Turnout in City Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38.2: 209-231.

79.

Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Korea Journal