바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

The Discourse of National Population Crisis and Its Framing of Bioethical Issues in Contemporary South Korea

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2009, v.49 no.3, pp.73-92
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2009.49.3.73
(KAIST)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Since the Hwang scandal, bioethics has come to occupy a significant place on the public agenda in South Korea. The South Korean state has expressed oftenconflicting interests in encouraging stem cell research and the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) industry to save the country while also introducing ethical regulations in conformity with “global standards.” This paper examines how the discourse of national population crisis has framed policy concerns and public debate on bioethical issues in contemporary South Korea, and investigates the changing biopolitics of South Korea through debates on the regulation of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and surrogacy. In this process, the paper takes the technologies of reproduction as its main focus of investigation. As a potent symbol of both the past and future, reproduction has become one of the most contested topics in contemporary politics, connecting individual lives and collective entities. Starting with a short summary of the Bioethics Law in South Korea, this paper will examine the debate on legal regulation of assisted reproduction and the controversial issue of surrogacy in the context of the depopulation crisis.

keywords
depopulation crisis assisted reproductive technology surrogacy bioethical issues biopolitics biotechnology

Reference

1.

Athanasiou, Athena. 2001. “Nostalgic Futures, Contentious Technologies: Reckoning Time and Population in Greece.” PhD diss., New School University.

2.

Baldwin, Peter. 1999. Contagion and the State in Europe, 1830-1930. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.

3.

Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

4.

Cho, Jaeji. 2007. The Reports Prepared for the Public Hearing on the Revision of Bioethics and Safety Act and the Legislation of the Protection and Regulation of Germ Cells Act, May 16, 46-49.

5.

Chung, Hyongmin. 2007. The Reports Prepared for the Public Hearing on the Revision of Bioethics and Safety Act and the Legislation of the Protection and Regulation of Germ Cells Act, May 16, 44-45.

6.

Declich, S., and Carter A. O. 1994. “Public Health Surveillance: Historical Origins, Methods and Evaluation.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 72.2: 285-304.

7.

Diprose, Rosalyn. 1994. The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual Difference. London: Routledge.

8.

Evans, John H. 2002. Playing God?: Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

9.

Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.

10.

Foucault, Michel. 1991 [1978]. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87- 104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Ginsburg, Faye, and Rayna Rapp, eds. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: the Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

12.

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Han, Sung-Goo, et al. 2003. “New Cloning Technologies and Bioethics Issues: The Legislative Process in Korea.” Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13: 216-219.

14.

Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. “In the Democracies of DNA: Ontological Uncertainty and Political Order in Three States.” New Genetics and Society 24.2: 139-156.

15.

Kim, Hoon-ki. 2001. “Hanguk saengmyeong gonghak jeongchaek uije hyeongseong gwajeong-e gwanhan yeongu” (A Study on the Policy Agenda Setting of Bioethics in Korea). PhD diss., Korea University.

16.

Koo, Inhoe. 2007. “On the New Bills of the Bioethics and Safety Act and the Protection and Regulation of Germ Cells Act.” Hankyoreh, May 19.

17.

Korea Brief. 2007. “Controversy over “Conditional Approval” of Somatic Cell Cloning Research.” April 9.

18.

Korea Culture and Tourism Policy Institute (KCTPI). 2006. Gwangwang saneop bok yunghap chokjin bangan—uiryo gwangwang-euol jungsimeuro (Promotion Measures for Convergence Between Tourism and Other Industry: Focusing on Medical Tourism). Seoul: KCTPI.

19.

Kuhse, Helga, and Peter Singer. 1999. “Introduction.” In Bioethics: An Anthology, edited by Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer. Oxford: Blackwell.

20.

Markel, H. 1997. Quarantine! East European Jewish Immigrants and the New York City Epidemics of 1892. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

21.

Markens, Susan. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

22.

Mooney, G. 1999. “Public Health versus Private Practice: the Contested Development of Compulsory Infectious Disease Notification in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 73: 238-267.

23.

Ong, Aihwa, and Stephen J. Collier, eds. 2005. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

24.

Paik, Young-Gyung. 2006. “The Traffic in Eggs: Cultural Construction of Ova ‘Donation’ Practice in Korea.” Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of Society for Social Studies of Science, November 1-5, Vancouver, Canada.

25.

Paik, Young-Gyung. 2007a. “Securing a Future through Reproductive Technologies and Population Control: The South Korean State’s Future Imaginary, 1960s to the Present.” Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of Association for Asian Studies, March 22-25, Boston, USA.

26.

Paik, Young-Gyung. 2007b. “Assisted Reproduction, Depopulation Crisis and Bioethics Law in South Korea.” Paper presented at joint annual meetings of LSA and the Research Committee on Sociology of Law (RCSL), July 25-28, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.

27.

Potter, Van Rensselaer. 1970. “Bioethics, the Science of Survival.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14: 127-153.

28.

Ragoné, Helena, and Sarah Franklin, eds. 1998. Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

29.

Rawlinson, Mary C. 2001. “The Concept of a Feminist Bioethics.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26.4: 405-416.

30.

Sargent, Caroline. 2003. “Polygamy, Disrupted Reproduction, and the State: Malian Migrants in Paris, France.” Social Science and Medicine 56: 1961- 1972.

31.

Schneider, Jane C., and Peter T. Schneider. 1996. Festival of the Poor: Fertility Decline and the Ideology of Class in Sicily, 1860-1980. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

32.

Shildrik, Margrit, and Roxanne Mykitiuk, eds. 2005. Ethics of Body: Post Conventional Challenges. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

33.

Tong, Rosemarie. 1997. Feminist Approaches to Bioethics: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Applications. Boulder, CO; Westview Press.

34.

Yoo, Kyeong-Hee. 2007. The Reports Prepared for the Public Hearing on the Revision of Bioethics and Safety Act and the Legislation of the Protection and Regulation of Germ Cells Act, May 16, 76-79.

Korea Journal