바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Two Paths for Alternative Medicine: Professionalization of Oriental Medicine and the Growth of Lay Acupuncturists in Korea

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2009, v.49 no.3, pp.44-72
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2009.49.3.44

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Alternative medicine is popular in Korea, as it is in Western societies. This paper aims to review the current state of alternative medicine, especially the growth and division of oriental medicine. In the modernization period, practitioners of oriental medicine were divided into a majority of regular oriental medical doctors (OMDs) and a minority group mainly composed of acupuncturists. OMDs have professionalized their work, while acupuncturists have seen their social status fall. OMDs promoted the professionalization of their medical practices and monopolization of knowledge. In contrast, acupuncturists have taken a more popularist approach, advocating low-tech therapy and sharing knowledge among people. Recently, they have advocated a popular health movement by training lay acupuncturists and providing free services. This paper discusses the factors that cause this two-tier approach and the limits of professionalization and the popular health movements.

keywords
alternative medicine CAM medical doctors oriental medical doctors acupuncturists

Reference

1.

Astin, J. A. 1998. “Why Patients Use Alternative Medicine: Results of a National Study.” Journal of American Medical Association 279: 1548- 1553.

2.

Association of Korean Oriental Medicine (AKOM). 1989. The 40 Years of History of the Association of Korean Oriental Medicine. Seoul: AKOM.

3.

Baer, H. 2004. Toward an Integrative Medicine: Merging Alternative Therapies with Biomedicine. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

4.

Bakx, K. 1991. “The ‘Eclipse’ of Folk Medicine in Western Society.” Sociology of Health and Illness 13.1: 20-38.

5.

Blaxter, M. 2004. Health. Cambridge: Polity Press.

6.

Burrows, R., S. Nettleton, and R. Bunton. 1995. “A Sociology and Health Promotion: Health Risk and Consumption under Late Modernism.” In The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analysis of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk, edited by R. Bunton, S. Nettelton, and R. Burrows, 1- 9. London: Routledge.

7.

Cant, S. 1996. “From Charismatic Teaching to Professional Training: The Legitimation of Knowledge and the Creation of Trust in Homeopathy and Chiropractic.” In Complementary and Alternative Medicines: Knowledge in Practice, edited by S. Cant and U. Sharma, 44-65. London: Free Association Books. Cant, S., and U. Sharma. 1999. A New Medical Pluralism?: Alternative Medicine, Doctors, Patients and the State. London: UCL Press.

8.

Cant, S., and U. Sharma. 1999. A New Medical Pluralism?: Alternative Medicine, Doctors, Patients and the State. London: UCL Press.

9.

Cho, Byong-Hee. 2000. “The Politics of Herbal Drugs in Korea.” Social Science & Medicine 51.4: 505-509.

10.

Cho, Byong-Hee. 2003. “Chimgu yeongyeok-eul dulleossan jeonmunjikgan-ui jipdan galdeung” (Jurisdictional Conflicts among Professions: The Fall and Rise of the Acupuncturist System in the Folk Sector). Bogeon-gwa sahoe gwahak (Health and Social Science) 14: 87-126.

11.

Cho, Byong-Hee. 2006. “Saenguihak-gwa hanuihak-ui sahoejeok gwangye—galdeung- gwa tonghap” (Social Relations of Biomedicine and Traditional Korean Medicine: Conflicts and Integration). Uicheolhak yeongu (Philosophy of Medicine) 2: 83-110. Coe, R. M. 1970. Sociology of Medicine. New York: McGraw Hill.

12.

Coe, R. M. 1970. Sociology of Medicine. New York: McGraw Hill.

13.

Eisenberg, D. M., et al. 1998. “Trends in Alternative Medicine Use in the United States, 1990-1997.” Journal of American Medical Association 280: 1569-1575.

14.

Freidson, E. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study in the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.

15.

Goldner, M. 2004. “Consumption as Activism: An Examination of CAM as Part of the Consumer Movement in Health.” In The Mainstreaming of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies in Social Context, edited by P. Tovey, G. Easthope, and J. Adams, 11-24. London: Routledge.

16.

Goldstein, M. S. 1999. Alternative Health Care: Medicine, Miracle, or Mirage? Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

17.

Goldstein, M. S. 2000. “The Growing Acceptance of Complementary and Alternative Medicine.” In Handbook of Medical Sociology, edited by C. E. Bird, P. Conrad, and A. M. Fremont, 284-297. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

18.

Hughes, K. 2004. “Health as Individual Responsibility: Possibilities and Personal Struggle.” In The Mainstreaming of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies in Social Context, edited by P. Tovey, G. Easthope, and J. Adams, 24-48. London: Routledge.

19.

Hwang, J. K. 2007. Uisa-ga mot gochineun hwanja-neun eotteoke hana (How to Do for the Patients Who Cannot Be Treated by Doctors). Vol. 2. Busan: Uri Munhwa.

20.

Jeon, Se-Il. 2000. Bowan daeche uihak (Complementary Alternative Medicine). Seoul: KyeChook.

21.

Jeon, Young-Chul. 2009. “2009 nyeon 1 wol 12 il—daehan minguk uiryosa-e yeoksajeogin nal” (January 12, 2009—A Historical Day of the Korean History of Medicine). Tmsarang 57: 16.

22.

Jeon, Mi-Yun. 2009. “Tteum-eul sarang hamyeonseo haengbok mandeulgi” (Loving Moxibustion and Making Happiness). Tmsarang 58: 13-15.

23.

Jeong, Seong-Hye. 2006. “Uri nara ollain hwanja gongdongche teukseong-e gwanhan yeongu” (The Study of the Characteristics of On-line Patient Communities in Korea). Master’s thesis, School of Public Health, Seoul National University.

24.

Jeong, You-Kyung. 2009. “Hanuisadeul-ui uiryo irwonhwa damnon-e gwanhan bunseok” (An Analysis of Oriental Medical Doctors’ Discourse on Unification of Biomedicine and Oriental Medicine). Master’s thesis, School of Public Health, Seoul National University.

25.

Kim, J. Y. 2005. “Hybrid Modernity: The Scientific Construction of Korean Medicine in a Global Age.” PhD diss., University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.

26.

Kim, J. Y. 2007. “Alternative Medicine’s Encounter with Laboratory Science: the Scientific Construction of Korean Medicine in a Global Age.” Social Studies of Science 37: 855-880.

27.

Kim, Nam-su. 2002. Chimsarang tteumsarang a naesarang (Loving Acupuncture and Loving Moxibustion). Seoul: Lovers of Acupuncture-Moxibustion.

28.

Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI). 2008. Oeguk mit uri nara-ui yusa uiryo unnyeong siltae josa (A Survey Report on the Present Status of Alternative Medicine in Domestic and Foreign Countries). Seoul: KHIDI.

29.

Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHASA). 2001. Hanguk-ui sahoe jipyo (Health and Welfare Indicators in Korea). Seoul: KIHASA.

30.

Lee, Gun-Yoo. 2009. “Tteum sarang nae sarang” (I Love Moxibustion). Tmsarang 59: 27-29.

31.

Lee, Sang-Il, et al. 1999. “Uri nara gungmin-ui bowan yobeop iyongnyul, iyong biyong-gwa biyong jichul” (Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Korea: Prevalence, Pattern of Use, and Out-of-Pocket Expenditure). Yebang uihak hoeji (Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine) 32.4: 546-555.

32.

Lee, Sang-Yi, et al. 2008. Uiryo minyeonghwa nonjaeng-gwa hanguk uiryo-ui mirae (The Debate on the Privatization of Health Care and the Future of Korean Health Care). Seoul: Mim Publication.

33.

Lee, Woo-Kwan. 1973. Sunan yeokjeong (The Sad History of Korean Acupuncture). Seoul: Korea Acupuncture Association.

34.

Lock, M. 1980. East Asian Medicine in Urban Japan. Berkeley: University of Berkeley Press.

35.

Lovers of Acupuncture-Moxibustion. 2002. “The Archive for the Policy of Acupuncture and Moxibustion.” Unpublished manuscript.

36.

Lovers of Acupuncture-Moxibustion. 2009. “Statistics for Ttmsarang Voluntary Care Service.” Tmsarang 57.10.

37.

Lupton, D. 1995. The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body. London: Sage.

38.

Martin, E. 2000. “Flexible Bodies: Science and a New Culture of Health in the US.” In Health, Medicine and Society: Key Theories, Future Agendas, edited by S. J. Williams, J. Gabe, and M. Calnan, 123-145. London: Routledge.

39.

Nettleton, S., and R. Bunton. 1995. “Sociological Critiques of Health Promotion.” In The Sociology of Health Promotion: Critical Analysis of Consumption, Lifestyle and Risk, edited by R. Bunton, S. Nettelton, and R. Burrows, 41-59. London: Routledge.

40.

O’Connor, B. 2000. “Conceptions of the Body in Complementary and Alternative Medicine.” In Complmentary and Alternative Medicine: Challenge and Change, edited by M. Kelner, B. Wellman, B. Pescosolido, and M. Saks, 39-60. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association.

41.

Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.

42.

Radley, A. 1994. Making Sense of Illness: The Social Psychology of Health and Disease. London: Sage.

43.

Saks, M. 1995. Professions and the Public Interest: Medical Power, Altruism and Alternative Medicine. London: Routledge.

44.

Saks, M. 2001. “Alternative Medicine and the Health Care Division of Labour: Present Trends and Future Prospects.” Current Sociology 49.3: 119-134.

45.

Seo, Hong-Kwan. 2000. “Hanyangbang uiryo irwonhwa—hanuihak-gwa yanguihak- eun mannaya handa” (The Unification of Biomedicine and Oriental Medicine: the Two Medicines Should Meet). In Hanguk uiryo daenonjaeng (The Big Debates in Korean Health Care), edited by Lee Jong-Chan, 286-310. Seoul: Sonamu.

46.

Thomas, K. J., J. Carr, L. Westlake, and B. T. Williams. 1991. “Use of Nonorthodox and Conventional Health Care in Great Britain.” British Medical Journal 302: 207-210.

47.

Turner, B. S. 1996. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London: Sage.

48.

World Health Organization. 1978. Alma Ata Declaration. Geneva: WHO.

49.

World Health Organization Kobe Center. 2001. Traditional Medicine: Better Science, Policy and Services for Health Development. Proceedings of a WHO International Symposium at Awaji Island, September 11-13.

Korea Journal