바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

The Never-Ending Myth: An Analysis of the Sociopsychological Mechanism of Hwang Woo-Suk Syndrome

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2009, v.49 no.2, pp.137-164
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2009.49.2.137



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Science is assumed to be located in the realm of objectivity. The Hwang Woo- Suk affair, however, showed that it could also be located within the realm of social pathology. The essence of Hwang syndrome was a hypnotic condition collaboratively created by patriotic fever, science, and the media. For scientific research, the attraction and risk incurred by public passion were too tempting to avoid. The media amplified the process of collective myth making by reporting scientific accomplishments truthfully at first, and then moving on to creating and delivering stories of heroic science and scientists. It was a kind of patriotism that was close to collective narcissism, which drove a majority of Korean population to blind faith in the fabricated scientific feats of Hwang. A survey analyzing the underlying mechanism of this mental chaos shows that before the Hwang affair broke out, people’s patriotic fervor, science, and the media formed a robust positive triangular equilibrium. In the process of the Hwang affair, the public sentiment of giving priority to national interest over scientific ethics or trustworthiness of the press won widespread sympathy.

keywords
Hwang Woo-Suk Hwang affair Hwangppa PD Notebook stem cell cell cloning scientific fraud fabrication Buck-Goudsmit affair BRIC (Biological Research Information Center)

Reference

1.

Altymeyer, B. 1981. Right-wing Authoritarianism. Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press.

2.

Beardsley, S. 2006. “Down in Flames.” Scientific American 294.3: 20-22.

3.

Buck, H., et al. 1990. “Phosphate-methylated DNA Aimed at HIV-1 RNA Loops and Integrated DNA Inhibits Viral Infectivity.” Science 248: 208- 212.

4.

Cha, Jae-Ho. 1985. “70 nyeondaemal-eseoui gachi, taedo mit sinnyeom-euro bon hangugin-ui sedaecha” (Generational Differences in Values, Attitudes, and Beliefs among Korean Adults in the Late 1970s). Sahoe simni yeongu (Studies in Social Psychology) 2.2: 129-168.

5.

Choi, Jang-Jip. 2006. “Hanguk minjujuui-ui byeonhyeong-gwa hegemoni” (The Transformation of Korean Democracy and Hegemony). Paper presented at conference titled “Is Democracy Still a Hopeful Discourse?” Institute of Democracy and Social Movements, SungKongHoe University, January 12.

6.

Chun, Kyu-Chan. 2006. “Hwang Woo-Suk satae-reul tonghaebon hanguk jeoneollijeum yangsik-ui bipan-gwa jeonmang” (Critics and Prospects of Korean Journalism Reviewed through the Hwang Woo-Suk Affair). In Sinhwa-ui churak, gugik-ui yuryeong (Myth and Falling Down: The Phantom of National Interest), edited by Won Yong-Jin and Chun Kyu- Chan, 341-376. Seoul: Hannarae.

7.

Couzin, J., and K. Unger. 2006. “Cleaning Up the Paper Trial.” Science 312: 38-42.

8.

Cunningham, A. 2005. “Research Leader of the Year, Woo Suk Hwang.” Scientific American 6: 48.

9.

Dearing, J. 1995. “Newspaper Coverage of Maverick Science: Creating Controversy through Balancing.” Public Understanding of Science 4: 341- 361.

10.

Felt, U. 1993. “Fabricating Science Success Stories.” Public Understanding of Science 2: 375-390.

11.

Gorke, A., and G. Ruhrmann. 2003. “Public Communication between Facts and Fictions: On the Construction of Genetic Risk.” Public Understanding of Science 12: 229-241.

12.

Greco, P. 2006. “New Scandals—Time to Rethink the Rules?” Journal of Science Communication 5.1: 7.

13.

Han, Gyu-Seog, and Soo-Jin Shin. 1999. “Hangugin-ui seonho gachi—sujikjeok jipdanjuui-eseo supyeongjeok gaeinjuui-ro” (A Cultural Profile of Korean Society: From Vertical Collectivism to Horizontal Individualism). Hanguk simni hakhoeji: sahoe mit seonggyeok (Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology) 13.2: 293-310.

14.

Hanada, T. 2006. “The Domination of Populistic Culture over Science and Journalism.” Paper presented at an international conference on “Trust and Ethics in the Investigative TV Journalism,” Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University, March 29.

15.

Hagendijik, R., and J. Meeus. 1993. “Blind Faith: Fact, Fiction and Fraud in Public Controversy over Science.” Public Understanding of Science 2: 391-415.

16.

Hwang, Sang-Min, Jin-Young Yang, and Young-Ju Kang. 2003. “Sedae jipdan-ui gachi-ro gubundoen raipeu seutail-gwa geu-e ttareun gwonwijuui yuhyeong-gwa seonghyang-ui bigyo” (Types of Lifestyles Differentiated by Values in Korean Cohort Groups Reflecting Their Authoritarian Personality). Hanguk simni hakhoeji: sahoe mit seonggyeok (Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology) 17.2: 17-33.

17.

Hwang, Sang-Min, and Jin-Young Yang. 2002. “Hanguk sahoe-ui sedae jipdan-e daehan simnihakjeok tamsaek: jeonijeok gongjon gwanjeom-eul tonghan daehaksaeng jipdan-ui sedae imiji bunseok” (The Image of Generations in Korean Society with Transferable Coexistence Perspective). Hanguk simni hakhoeji: sahoe mit seonggyeok (Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology) 16.3: 75-93.

18.

Hwang, W. S., et al. 2004. “Evidence of Pluripotent Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from a Cloned Blastocyst.” Science 303: 1669.

19.

Hwang, W. S., 2005. “Patient-Specific Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Human SCNT Blastocysts.” Science 308: 1777.

20.

Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Post Modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

21.

Iwabuchi, K. 2007. “What Is So Cultural about the Study of Media Culture Now?: Beyond Brand Nationalism into Media Citizenship.” Paper presented at an international conference on “New Perspectives of Media Studies of the BK21 Digital Media and Communication in Korea and Institute of Communication Research,” Seoul National University, October 6.

22.

Judson, H. 2004. Fraud in Science. Orlando: Harcourt.

23.

Kang, Myung-Koo, et al. 2007. “Aegukjeok yeolmang-gwa sunggohan gwahak” (Patriotic Passion and Sublime Science). Hanguk eollon hakbo (Korean Journal of Communication) 51.1: 59-90.

24.

Kennedy, D. 2006a. “Editorial Expression of Concern.” Science 311: 36.

25.

Kennedy, D. 2006b. “Editorial Retraction.” Science 311: 335.

26.

Kevles, D. 1998. The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character. New York: W. W. Norton.

27.

Kim, Daejung. 2005. “Witch Hunting for the Common People.” Chosun Ilbo, December 5.

28.

Kim, Myeong-eon, Kim Ui-cheol, and Bak Yeong-sin. 2000. “Cheongsonyeongwa seongin gan-ui sedae chai-wa yusaseong” (Intergenerational Differences and Similarities between Adolescents and Adults). Hanguk simni hakhoeji: sahoe munje (Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues) 6.1: 181-204.

29.

Lee, Seung-Hwan, et al. 1999. Asiajeok gachi (The Asian Values). Seoul: Tradition and Modernity.

30.

Lewontin, R. 2004. “Dishonesty in Science.” New York Review of Books 51.18: 38-40.

31.

Moody, H., et al. 1990. “Inhibition of HIV-1 Infectivity Phosphate-methylated DNA: Retraction.” Science 250: 125-126.

32.

Na, Eun-Yeong, and Jae-Ho Cha. 1999. “1970 nyeondae-wa 1990 nyeondae gan hangugin-ui gachigwan byeonhwa-wa sedaecha jeunggam” (Changes of Values and Generational Gaps Between 1970s and 1990s in Korea). Hanguk simni hakhoeji: sahoe mit seonggyeok (Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology) 13.2: 37-60.

33.

Na, Eun-Yeong, and Kyung-Hwan Min. 1998. “Hanguk munhwa-ui ijungseong-e gwanhan sogo” (A Study on the Dualism of Korean Culture). Sahoe gwahak yeongu (Social Science Studies) 24: 3-16.

34.

Nisbet, M., D. Brossard, and A. Jroepsch. 2003. “Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in the Age of Press/Politics.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8.2: 36-70.

35.

Palfreman, J. 2002. “Bringing Science to the Television Audience.” Nieman Reports 56.3: 32-34.

36.

Park, Sung-Gwan. 2003. “Process of Modernization in Korea Society and Changes in Social Communication Circles.” Paper presented at annual symposium on “Digital Civil Society and Social Informatics,” Seoul National University and University of Tokyo, October 24.

37.

Park, Sung-Gwan. 2005. “Gullon-ui chulhyeon-gwa hanguk minjujuui” (The Emergence of Mass opinion and Democracy in Korea). Paper presented at conference on Change of Korea society and the Role of Journalism in 21century, Institute of Communication Research, Seoul National University, June 3.

38.

Paul, D. 2004. “Spreading Chaos: The Role of Popularizations in the Diffusion of Scientific Ideas.” Written Communication 21.1: 32-68.

39.

Rheingold, H. 2003. Chamyeo gunjung: hyudaepon-gwa inteonet-euro mujanghan saeroun gunjung (Participating Crowd: New Crowd Equipped with Mobile Phones and Internet). Translated by Yi Wongyeong. Seoul: Hwangkumgazi. Originally published as Participating Crowd (2002).

40.

Snyder, E., and J. Loring. 2006. “Beyond Fraud—Stem-Cell Research Continues.” New England Journal of Medicine 354.4: 321-324.

41.

Theiss-Morse, E., et al. 1992. “Mixing Methods: A Multistage Strategy for Studying Patriotism and Citizen Participation.” Political Analysis 39.1: 89-121.

42.

Toumey, C. 1996. “Conjuring Science in the Case of Cold Fusion.” Public Understanding of Science 5: 121-133.

43.

Weaver, D., et al. 1986. “Altered Repertoire of Endogenous Immunoglobulin Gene Expression in Transgenic Mice Containing a Rearranged Mu Heavy Chain Gene.” Cell 45: 247-259.

Korea Journal