바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Intercommunication between “Realism” and “Modernism”: A Return to the Literary Work

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2007, v.47 no.1, pp.8-27
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2007.47.1.8

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Korean literature in the twentieth century was marked by the confrontation between realism and modernism. This confrontation intensified particularly with the division after liberation and the Korean War. Moreover, several opportunities to overcome the confrontation were lost due to the immature state of both subjective and objective conditions. Consequently, the opposition between realism and modernism became, just like the Balkans, a sensitive tinderbox of Korean literature. In this junction, what is important now is a return to the workitself, while making clear that at the place where the best works are produced, realism and modernism have already reached a state of intercommunication.The confrontation between realism and modernism can be subsumed into the issue of how to survive the modern capitalism we face today. In Korean society, modernity is still something that needs to be achieved and simultaneously something that will end in catastrophe if it is not overcome. The intercommunication between realism and modernism is the first starting point of my efforts to visualize a solution to this conundrum.

keywords
realism modernism hyeondae geundae modernity KimSu-yeong Kim Gi-rim national literature theoryIn realism modernism hyeondae geundae modernity KimSu-yeong Kim Gi-rim national literature theoryIn

Reference

1.

Baudelaire, Charles, (1960) Nasim (The Naked Heart) , Yangmoon.

2.

Giddens, Anthony, (1999) the Renewal of Social Democracy, Polity Press

3.

Paik, (1978) Poetic World of Kim Su-yeong,

4.

Yu, Jung-ha, (1999) “Hana-eseo dul-ro: Kim Su-yeong geu ihu” (From One to Two: Kim Su-yeong and After). , Changjak-Changjak-gwa bipyeong

Korea Journal