바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Paradigm Shifts of Regions and Icons: The Aesthetic Significance of Kim Hong-do’ Paintings

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2006, v.46 no.2, pp.208-232

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

keywords
the influence of this experience his view of painting changed and he became fascinated with landscape rather than with genre painting.2 paradigm shifts dichotomous regions multi-regions sym-bolic icons impressive icons pseudo-literati Confucian ideology mentalit&eacute

Reference

1.

Susan. 1971. The Chinese Literati on Painting. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

2.

James. 1988. Three Alternative Histories of Chinese Painting. Kansas City Spencer Museum of Art.,

3.

(ois.1994.emptyandfull) the Language of Chinese Painting. Translated by Michael H. Kohn. Boston & London,

4.

(2000) Munhwa-ro bomyeon yeoksa-ga dallajinda (The Cultural Understanding of History), Seoul: Book World

5.

(1999) New Finding on Some Possible Artistic Sources of Kim Hongdo’s Lunch,

6.

(1975) The Philosophy of Art History . Translated by Hwang Chiwoo Dolbegae. Originally published as .Methoden moderner Kunstbetrachtung, C. H. Beck

7.

(____________.1993.yesul-uisahoehak1974) Sociology of Art . Translated by Choe Seong-man and Yi Byeong-jin. Seoul Hangilsa. Originally published as Soziologie der Kunst, C. H. Beck

8.

Yue-fu. 1994. “A Review for The Inner Opium War.” 21st Century 22.,

9.

(2003) Dosanghak-gwa dosang haeseokhak (Iconography and Iconology), Ikonographie und Ikonologie , Seoul: Sakyejul, Köln: DUMONT Buchverlag

10.

The Founder of the Archetype of Genre Painting in the 18th Century,

11.

(1996) Joseon hugi hoehwa-ui sasil jeongsin (Realism in the late Joseon Dynasty Paintings), Seoul: Hakgojae

12.

(2005) Haeche-wa hondon: Hyeonjae yesul jeongsin-ui yuga mihak jeok bipan (Dissolution and Confusion: a Confucian Aesthetical Criticism of Hyeonjae’s Spirit of Art), Seoul: East Asia Culture Forum

13.

(2006) Xujia wenren’ xianxiangrujia meixue fanshi zai chaoxian houqi yishushehuixue li de yiyi he jiazhi (“Pseudo-literati” Phenomenon: the Significance and Values of the Paradigm of Confucian Aesthetics in the Late Joseon Dynasty),

14.

George. 1959. Principles of Chinese Painting. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

15.

(1983) Janet. 1994. Mihak-gwa yesul sahoehak. Translated by Yi Seong-hun. Seoul Theory & Praxis. Originally published as Aesthetics and the Sociology of Art,

16.

(1996) Uri nara-ui yet geurim (Korean Paintings of the Past), Seoul: Hakgojae

17.

Critical Review of History,

Korea Journal