바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343

Comparing Korean Liberalism with British Liberalism in Their Respective Roles in the Evolution of Democracy

Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2006, v.46 no.2, pp.184-207


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Our paper aims to compare the historical characteristics of democratization in Korea and Britain, and its result and significance in these two countries. In carrying out this project, we put special focus on the roles and the characteristics of liberalism in Korea and Britain. In Korean and British democratization, liberalism played a leading role in the his- zation relied on the spread of liberal values and principles, while Korea made it its objective to normalize or actualize the framework of liberal democracy given from above. The differences in the process of democratization were accompanied by divergences in both the composition of the supporters of liberalism and in its role. The two cases also reveal clear differences in the relationship between the evolution of democracy and liberalism and the development of liberalism after democratization. From our examination of the Korean and British experiences, we argue that the fact that Korea trod a different route should not lead to the underestimation or devaluing of Korean democratization.

keywords
when the transition from authoritarian dictatorship to democracy was completed. 2. To take an example as we see below whereas democratization in Britain was liberalism democracy democratization liberal democra-cy universal suffrage franchise reform political right

Reference

1.

(2003) A Review of the Intellectual Thrust to Adopt Democracy in the Late 19th Century,

2.

Anthony. 1984. The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism. New York, Basil Blackwell.

3.

(2004) Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal, New York: Pearson Longman

4.

(1998) Politics without Democracy, 1815-1914, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

5.

Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, Cambridge University Press.

6.

(1995) A Study on the Implementation of Democracy in Korea: From the Incident of 26 October 1979 to the Establishment of Kim Young Sam Government, Sahoibipyong sa

7.

(2002) Minjuhwa ihu-ui minju juui: hanguk minju juui-ui bosujeok giwon-gwa wigi (Democracy in the Post-Democratization Period: Conservative origin and Crisis of Korean Democracy), Seoul: Humanitas

8.

(2004) Minju juui-wa heonjeong juui: miguk-gwa hanguk (Democracy and Constitutional Governance: The United States and Korea), Miguk heonbeop-gwa minjujuui (How Democratic Is the American Constitution), Seoul: Humanitas

9.

(2000) Yugyo-wa jayu juui (Confucianism and Liberalism),

10.

(2002) Democratisation in Britain: Elites, Civil Society and Reform since 1800, London: Palgrave Macmillan

11.

(.1994.sijang) Korean Democratic Transition and Theories of Political Economy,

12.

(2000) Some Reflections on Recent Democratization in South Korea,

13.

(2002) Democratization of Korea and Koreanization of Democracy to the Eyes of the West-Oriented Perspective, Koreanized Adoption of Democracy, Seoul: Chaek Sesang

14.

(2004May) The Formation of Democracy in Britain (1832-1880): Politics, Church and Democratization, Korea Research Foundation Joint Conference,

15.

Ian. 1977. Politics and the Churches in Great Britain 1832 to 1868. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

16.

(2005) Hanguk-ui geundae gukga geonseol-gwa jayu juui: minjuhwa-ui giwon-gwa jeonmang-e daehan jaegochal (Modern State Building and Liberalism in Korea: A Reconsideration of the Origin and the Prospect of Democratization),

17.

(1997) Hanguk-ui gukga hyeongseong-gwa minju juui (Formation of Nation-State in Korea and Democracy), Seoul: Korea University Press

18.

(2005) Heonbeop, heonbeop juui, geurigo hanguk minju juui: 2004nyeon Roh Moo-hyun daetongnyeong tanhaek satae-reul jungsim-euro (Constitution, Constitutionalism, and Democracy in South Korea: Focusing on the Presidential Impeachment by the National Assembly in 2004),

19.

Marie. 1971. “The ‘Monitor’ on the Constitution 1755-1765 New Light on the Ideological Origins of English Radicalism.” English Historical Review 86.,

20.

(1999) Liberalism, A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

21.

(2001) The New Liberalism: Reconciling Liberty and Community, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Korea Journal