[Debate] Asian Values: Methodological Issues and Tasks

김혁래

Abstract

This paper attempts to identify methodological issues and tasks in defining Asian values and to discuss the utility and functionality of the Asian values debate, focusing on the social science literature dealing with Asian values. Pointing out the ambiguity and inaccuracy of conceptualization of Asian values in the literature, this paper reveals that the practical utility and functionality of Asian values in the social science literature have been very weak. In conclusion, in order for concept of Asian values to served a useful and practical function as explanans in the social science literature, this paper suggests that the concept should be defined specifically, elaborate the practical utility, and establish a sound logical system.

keywords: Asian values, universalism, particularism, Asian capitalism, Asian civil society, explanans and explanandum, dimensionality, fallacy of negative comparison and composition, ecological fallacyAsian Values: Methodological Issues and TasksKim Hyuk-Rae, Asian values, universalism, particularism, Asian capitalism, Asian civil society, explanans and explanandum, dimensionality, fallacy of negative comparison and composition, ecological fallacyAsian Values: Methodological Issues and TasksKim Hyuk-Rae

바로가기메뉴

Korea Journal

논문 상세

Vol.42 No.4

[Debate] Asian Values: Methodological Issues and Tasks

Abstract

Korea Journal